[via Gumby from the gates of rape loving Hell]
August 29, 2013
Every Now And Then My Bladder Fails Me…
Posted by franc under art, great idiots of the world, new new atheism, pseudo-skepticism, yellow journalism | Tags: crazy cunt lady, freethoughtblogs, ophelia benson, prunes |[9] Comments
March 13, 2013
Ophelia Benson – It’s Not Link Whoring When I Do It
Posted by franc under disinformation, hyperreality, misandry, new new atheism, propaganda, pseudo-skepticism, puritanism, yellow journalism | Tags: airheads, Butterflies and Wheels, charlatans, crazy cunt lady, deadbeats, despair, frauds, freethoughtblogs, human tapeworms, human vacuums, Lawrence Krauss, link whoring, ophelia benson, parasites, please love me, prunes, Richard Dawkins, riding on the work of others, vanity spam, worthlessness |[18] Comments
Has Ophie ever done *anything* of value *anywhere*?
link whoring – (Internet, idiomatic) The practice of going out of one’s way to place links to one’s website on someone else’s webpage.
21 Ways to legally steal traffic to your blog from the big boys –
#3. Rant Aloud: Ranting to steal traffic legally is a great way you should go if you desperately need traffic to your blog site. Here, you go to where the sites you need are. All you need to do here is to rant…
Let’s face it – blatant link whoring is a vile practice, probably as old as spam itself (and it is, in effect, little more than spam). Many of us, at one time or another, have experienced spikes in blood pressure from repeat infringements by its more shameless abusers. (more…)
November 25, 2012
Crazy Ophelia Keeping The Snarl Stats Up
Posted by franc under great idiots of the world, hyperreality, new new atheism, nihilism, pseudo-skepticism, shrieking hysteria, yellow journalism | Tags: barking at shadows, batshit insane, crazy cunt lady, Dear Muslima, gibberish, incoherence, ophelia benson, prunes, snarling |[15] Comments
Benson – still snarlin’
Quite amazing. Ophelia “crazy cunt lady” Benson is an unstoppable machine. Only days after posting the comprehensive study on her linguistic barbarism, she manages to hork up this fur-ball of incoherent snarling in what is pretty much her standard format nowadays, stolen “fair use” quoted text outnumbering her “original” words by ~2:1 (124:72 to be precise in this instance). Here she is spitting and cursing about Saudi plans to electronically monitor the movements of their women, much as privileged westerners track house pets. The article she cites, and others elsewhere, are short on detail as to exactly how the Saudis are going to implement this, but it looks like they are falling short of implanted microchips – (more…)
grey lining 