Ron Lindsay says he played Devil’s Advocate to make people question and better support their own viewpoints; PZ Myers freaks out. How could Myers read that entire article and completely ignore this paragraph?
“Some may wonder why if, ultimately, I oppose the death penalty, I bother criticizing those who also do so, but on other grounds. Because reasons matter. Evidence matters. Why someone holds a position can be, in some circumstances, as important as the position itself, especially if someone’s dogmatic adherence to a viewpoint betrays a tendency to accept a position simply because that is what Christians are supposed to believe, or Muslims are supposed to believe— or humanists are supposed to believe.”
Any thinking person would take the approach that PZ Meyers et al are essentially authoring and condoning womens sexual abuse of children, via flipping the rape paradigm upside down.
Instead of ” men are all rapists” we would then see ” women are all allo-lickers” which fully explains several things, chuef of which is 1) critics of Meyers et al fail to read up on counter arguments against his perverse narrative 2) critics of the males as rapists paradigm fail to clearly compare narratives, and come up with counter-biased arguments 3) men ( like you) understate, fail to imagine, minimize, infantilize, or dismiss female propensity to actually rape- most female initiated “rape” happens to children, because rape is a “crime of power” not sex.
Women undoubtedly have piwer iver children, and ” allo-lickung” is the gateway crime.