Something I found a while ago that underscores a key point made in the last post. Says it all. Amusing in a “walk away in despair” kind of way –
http://twitter.com/rebeccawatson/status/280787830345699330
https://twitter.com/rebeccawatson/status/14996176919
And Mr. Deity chimes in with some sage advice at 5:17 –
August 15, 2013 at 12:56 pm
But Franc, can’t you READ. She specifically SAID that she doesn’t drink to get DRUNK. If she were DRUNK, and then RAPED, she would have to bear some RESPONSIBILITY, which we both know is exactly the same as BLAME, FAULT and CONDEMNATION.
August 16, 2013 at 7:09 pm
I shouldn’t really be here. According to PeeZee it makes me “Filth” & your no different from Markuze except for several things, what should i do? So is it true that they never leave you with an empty glass at A/S cons? IF it is sign me up quick.
August 16, 2013 at 11:27 pm
I have long been convinced that A/S conferences and other activities (drinking skeptically and skeptics in the pub) enable the unusually high rate of active alcoholism in the anti-theist community. Watson’s hangover cure is hair of the dog. Does she ever draw a sober breath unaccompanied by a horrendous hangover?
Ironically, many of the founding members, such as P&T and Randi are teetotalers.
August 17, 2013 at 2:42 am
Just to be clear – I’m not against boozing. I’m just against boozing when there are morons in the room. That is where the disaster starts. I refuse to acknowledge that those concocting drama are functional adults – they may be legal adults, but they are not functional adults. As for Myers and Watson, I am ::cough:: skeptical they’d even be able to function in a booze free environment. Should check out Korsakoff’s syndrome.
And seeing as there is no practical way to ensure a moron free zone, that leaves making it dry the only alternative. The real people can find another, idiot free venue to party at – I’m sure most would be relieved at the alternative set up.
August 19, 2013 at 12:26 pm
Well I’ll drink to that.
Are you still at the slimepit Hoggle ?
August 19, 2013 at 1:57 pm
Not regularly. The signal-to-noise ratio has succeeded in driving quite a few of us away. Just try and mention guns or i-junk and see what happens. Kinda like patriarchy on the baboon board.
August 19, 2013 at 2:06 pm
The problem with all of these boards is that they tend to get dominated by those you post, and post, and post.
Justicar was the worst for this, but there is selection for the most long winded.
August 19, 2013 at 2:53 pm
Indeed. The addiction to seeing one’s handle magically pop up on screen over and over and over and over…
It ceased to be relevant when some folks started taking cheap potshots as even cheaper revenge for unspecified past grievances. And I refuse to waste hours of time unsmearing willful misrepresentations of what I have said in blabbermouthing arms races. So the easiest solution is to move on. There are better, more concise ways to receive information than sifting through haystacks for needles.
August 19, 2013 at 12:28 pm
Watson: “I don’t drink to get drunk. I drink to get EVEN” – what the heck is that supposed to mean?
August 19, 2013 at 1:53 pm
Entrapment. Hoarding ammunition to use against those that amy deviate from ideological orthodoxy at some future date.
August 22, 2013 at 11:08 pm
O. I took it as meaning “to achieve a state of equilibrium”.
That is, mental/emotional stability (as do all addicts jonesing for the next hit).
Or possibly even “horizontal, with low entropy”.
August 21, 2013 at 4:39 am
Is there any place you post regularly now? I always look forward to your posts and even if I don’t agree find it thought provoking.
August 30, 2013 at 8:46 am
“If you have sex with someone who is drunk, they are unable to consent and that is rape.”
What if Shermer was drunk during these alleged incidents? Does that mean he was raped? Or is that not something that anyone cares about because patriarchy?
August 30, 2013 at 2:16 pm
Don’t be stupid. He has a penis. Therefore he floats, ergo he’s a duck. Guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Take your rape apologetics elsewhere misogynist.