The Talking Prune’s desperation to cherry-pick for the sake of confirmation bias is well documented and now the stuff of legend. Of all the baboons, she is the one that most consistently has determination enough to bloody her fingernails while scraping the bottom of the barrel.
This is all very much evident in her current barfing – she somehow managed to stumble across the latest, but certainly not the greatest, outrage from a second tier wannabe provocateur cum1 yellow journalist Kyle Sandilands in faraway in Australia (upside down land for the baboons).
This is just trashy headline grabbing in the tradition of Britain’s gutter tabloids, and very much in the contemporary tradition of the baboon board –
As per usual, there is absolutely nil background or research on the target of her spleen. Just a straight copy-n-paste from some newspaper coupled with the usual cocktail of outrage and indignation and, of course, a broad brush smear to imply that Sandilands is somehow an identical creature to myself, and anyone else that refuses to drink the FTB ideological Kool-aid –
No offers to kick her in the cunt? Huh; I thought that was part of the package deal.
Hell will be a cool place before this intellectual desert will ever reference that quote accurately, or be honest about anything at all come to think of it. But for smear purposes, it suffices to make the implied connection between Sandilands and the heretics – her credulous baboon readership is never one to ever demand relevance or substance and will never know any better.
And again, as usual, I feel obligated to fill the omissions of convenience that the dried up one religiously avoids, because reality never does anything helpful for her in any of her causes –
- Sandilands consistently has around a 10% approval rating with the general public and an overwhelming majority have simply stopped even listening or reading about anything even slightly associated with him. This minority is mostly from left field on the smarts bell curve – which coincidently is also home to most of the baboons. He is in fact just part of the common trash demographic that can be found in any society and the only folks that ever express surprise at that fact are populist moralists, like Benson, that believe they can milk some propaganda advantage from it because the buffoons that look up to them are generally dumber than dog shit.
- His boot-in-mouth, much like with freethoughtblogs, seems to be a business model. Fracas like the current one are tediously commonplace, and there is no shortage of teevee news vox pop footage which is remarkably consistent – males expressing support are rare to non-existent, and virtually all of the words of support come from 20-something females.
- Surprisingly, monsters like myself have detested Sandilands since before he ever became a mainstream nuisance. Similarly, I don’t know any Ophelia-branded rapists or woman beaters that can manage to say anything at all about him other than expletive laden derision. We tend to dislike Sandilands for the same reasons we detest most of freefromthoughtblogs – for being a vacuous, bigoted, slanderous, substance free, ethically destitute harlot.
- If you changed absolutely nothing about Sandilands character, style and substance, and merely shifted the focus of his antagonism to misogynists and sexists, he would be absolutely indistinguishable from PZ Myers. Both play in the second tier of celebrity wannabe-dom desperately grasping for more, and they even look like they are related –
Jackie O, Sandilands fawning and approving sidekick, is also pretty much a kindred spirit to Becky Watson, except for a couple of minor details. Firstly, she’s passably cute, and second, she doesn’t spend her life wallowing in victim politics. But otherwise, she’s the same superficial, self-centered bag-of-ball-bearings Becky is. She would probably even agree the church executed Galileo.
In other words, Sandilands et al. are just urinal mints in life’s toilet who through no innate talent or merit of their own have found some kind of pseudo-success in the world. Much like most of the human detritus at freefromthoughtblogs.
So, attempting to smear myself and other critics via this tenuous non-blog entry on Butterflies and Wheels is readily visible as an absurdity to anyone who is not a baboon. But the parallels with the baboon board itself on the other hand are quite striking, and make Kyle and Jackie O peas in a pod with the Prune and the Baboon.
Of course there will be denials from the Prune that this was her intent. But then the baboons also deny equating folks like me to car bombers or that Watson ever called for a Dawkins boycott. It really does take a baboon to believe anything they say. But there really is no substance or purpose to this item other than to add to the BigLie by endless repetition of trivia. And they call me crazy.
1 – Make some thwapping noises to yourself just for Ophelia’s sake.
November 26, 2011 at 5:23 pm
Sandilands is an irrelevant cunt. Him and Ophelia should hook up.
Also, slightly OT, but what’s with the pop-up ads on FTB? It’s so 90’s and incredibly fricken’ annoying. It’s enough to make one think the true motive for the big move was money…
November 26, 2011 at 5:32 pm
Sandilands is an irrelevant cunt. Him and Ophelia should hook up.
He’s a moron, but I don’t hate him that much.
It’s enough to make one think the true motive for the big move was money…
Of course it was money. This kind of shameless and mindless populism is always about personal gain. The popups are just more stupid tricks Myers is using to squeeze every last cent of revenue out of the system. He has similar dirty tricks in his RSS feeds. This and the fact that he makes no mention whatsoever of his readership numbers tends to indicate the Crisis Factory may not be quite the roaring success his ego demands.
November 26, 2011 at 5:37 pm
They moved into their gated-echo-ghetto so that they could exclude we jesters[1], and enjoy the sounds of their own empty infantile witterings and baseless-bitchings unmolested by external reality.
________________
[1] Jesters and Prophets have long held the vital rôle of keeping the otherwise all-ruling tyrant’s feet squarely on the ground.
Freefromthought blogs dread such reminders of their vacuity.
November 27, 2011 at 12:20 am
“Also, slightly OT, but what’s with the pop-up ads on FTB? It’s so 90′s and incredibly fricken’ annoying. It’s enough to make one think the true motive for the big move was money…”
Yes, the fascists are practicing capitalism. Weird.
November 27, 2011 at 1:00 am
The “Advertise” tab at the top of every FTB page is a big hint on motive. Interestingly, at some point they’ve changed that page. It used to display ad sizes one could purchase, with prices attached (IIRC). Now it’s just ‘send us an email’. They’re claiming one can achieve 150,000 ad impressions per day for the web-site.
…but what’s with the pop-up ads on FTB? It’s so 90′s and incredibly fricken’ annoying.
LOL! 😀
Never noticed them. AdBlockPlus is a lovely addition to one’s browser.
November 27, 2011 at 1:15 am
They’re claiming one can achieve 150,000 ad impressions per day for the web-site.
I guess a 200% exaggeration for them is pretty low on the overall bullshit scale compared to the other derangement they keep pumping out –
https://www.google.com/adplanner/planning/site_profile?hl=en#siteDetails?identifier=freethoughtblogs.com&lp=true
November 27, 2011 at 1:17 am
And it’s also worth mentioning that Ophelia one basic fact in error. Sandilands’ diatribe against Stephenson was for her critique of his television show, not his radio program. It’s right there in the first sentence of the article Ophelia links to.
It’s fucking annoying when professional writers (including those who purport to be such) can’t get the basic facts right. It’s sloppy, and demonstrates a profound disrespect for the reader.
But it is indicative of what FTB is all about: churning out content to increase page impressions to increase revenue. Accuracy is not important.
November 27, 2011 at 1:30 am
Fact check? You jest. Hearsay and chinese whispers. The only test for veracity ever performed – “is it what we want to hear?”
But it is indicative of what FTB is all about: churning out content to increase page impressions to increase revenue. Accuracy is not important.
This is what I keep repeating – it is pure yellow journalism.
November 26, 2011 at 5:26 pm
Also, her trying to link him and your cunt kick is just… bizarre. WTF?
November 26, 2011 at 5:41 pm
Its just what I said it is. Same as what’s being done to Abbie Smith. This is BigLie engineering – relentlessly repeating trivial falsehoods to eventually create the impression of tacit truth. Just try and find a substantiated slander anywhere on the Prune’s blog. You won’t. And she’s a fucking black liar elsewhere. This is her on Russell Blackford’s facebook wall from a few days ago –
Expressing mock shock that someone had attacked Stef McGraw and others. Absolute ethical wasteland.
November 27, 2011 at 3:22 am
Franc.. Wait.. thats a misinterpretation.. it looks like Ophelia is wondering who is expressing the solidarity. Its actually an Indian board that I used to be in, and argued with in the past over elevatorgate.
Russell Blackford
I hereby express MY solidarity with Stef McGraw, Paula Kirby, and Richard Dawkins.
Share · Wednesday at 5:27pm ·
Sam Bigelow I missed something. Are they under attack?
Wednesday at 7:20pm
Russell Blackford Well, people are expressing their solidarity with people who have attacked them in the past.
Wednesday at 7:23pm
Ophelia Benson Rilly? I missed it too. Who are?
Wednesday at 7:29pm
Russell Blackford Nirmutka, in its wisdom, has put out an official statement of solidarity with Rebecca Watson and Jen McCreight (re Elevatorgatism). Just when we all thought we could forget about Elevatorgate and try to move on. Btw, I’m not planning to debate this here or anywhere else, but of course it brings back all my anger about how Stef and Paula were treated by Watson.
Wednesday at 7:38pm
Ophelia Benson Oh, I see. I’m friendly with Ajita and with Nirmukta, so I’ll just tiptoe away.
Wednesday at 7:46pm
November 27, 2011 at 5:27 am
Thanks Astro,
The baboons really should take notice that we appreciate being corrected when we miss something, and we do not all attack the one correcting us.
November 27, 2011 at 11:37 am
Either interpretation is still a deception – Prune is still expressing her child like innocence and claiming to have no knowledge of the filth. The comment she was responding to, to me, logically seems to be –
November 27, 2011 at 5:29 am
so I suppose a small man is okay to shout insults in the prune’s mind.
November 27, 2011 at 6:46 am
No, not really. She’s a bit more subtle (aka, snake-in-the-grass) than that.
But the King and his baboons have quite clearly and officially notified the world on many occasions that small women shouting deeply personal insults combined with implicit assumptions of gleefully witnessed porcupine accidents at almost every male being on the planet is indeed the one best, true, right, and just expression of free speech and thought.
Umbridge tends to surreptitiously follow that ideology but covers it in variegated and colourful sheeps clothing in an attempt to disguise.
/in my opinion
November 27, 2011 at 8:21 am
Hey Franc!
Did you catch Bunnygate?
The Big Baboon may be experiencing the Streisand effect.
Methinks he should have just moved on like he did with the Michelle Bachmann blunder.
But the Naked One admonished the horde for bothering him on Thanksgiving. But why? Oh, he was hungry and cranky. Certainly, there could be no more pointless holiday for atheists. No one to “thank” after all, right?
Is there anymore sexist tradition than males lounging around guzzling beer and watching football? Meanwhile, the women-folk wake before dawn in the grandest expression of subordinate martyrdom. As they carry the sacred torch passed down from their mother’s mother’s mother’s grandmother, PZ is annoyed that by the crisis factory’s childish demands. Geez, it’s almost more tiresome as the frivolous as the female servant’s sole request to bow our heads for the ceremonial blessing. Outrageous how insolent of his minions impose an additional meaningless delay before the gluttonous pleasure!
The exhausted woman might catch her breath before returning to the drudgery of cleaning up the greasy mess. There is just so much time while the coffee is brewing until the insatiable crowd digestion has freed up room for pie.
Black Friday starts at midnight! I’m sure his better half is over-joyed at the alarm going off 3 hours after she collapses in exhaust. It was bad enough when she finally was unable to doze off next him snoring off the feast in the dark Minnesota master bed.
Wow, I sound like Pornanalysis’ alter-ego!
IRL, my DH toiled at my side yesterday. And he thinks Black Friday and Christmas time overshadows Thanksgiving too much. Plus it irks him that nobody has a clue who exactly they are thanking. Weird that other than attending mass every week and pining over dissing TG, you’d have no idea he was (Catholic)Christian.
But that’s the US for ya! How does the gnu baboon justify participating in this archaic observance?
November 27, 2011 at 9:25 am
It celebrates the ruthless domination (by dint of force) of white-man over the original inhabitants of the continent.
It is entirely in keeping with not only his character, but his raison d’être as a tin-pot tyrant.
November 27, 2011 at 8:26 am
OMG!
I posted under my public nym!
You guys don’t know her either, though.
Seriously, I am NOT socking!!!
I only post here and at ERV rarely. I am a lurker!!!
November 27, 2011 at 11:04 am
BFD. In case you haven’t noticed, folks here tend to be more interested in what you say, not who you are.
Bunnygate? Yes. Awesome isn’t it? Whenever there is too much of a break in the public lynching routine, the baboons start turning on each other. This is business as usual.
November 27, 2011 at 1:58 pm
Semi off-topic, and may already be old news, but I stumbled across a good post over at a site called Traditional Christianity which dates back to August, but shares a good number of our observations here. Those “stupid religious morons” clearly aren’t so stupid after all; they certainly show themselves superior to the baboons in pretty much every possible way.
If this comment pings back to the site, the author (Clarence in Baltimore) may be amused to learn (if he hasn’t already) that his statement, “This looks like the opening salvo in a larger war,” (number 5 in “My Thoughts” subsection) was spot on.
It should be noted that my search query was “manjaw marcotte” on DuckDuckGo.
November 27, 2011 at 3:39 pm
Manjaw Marcotte?
I must say that I find it fairly distasteful when rational folk ‘have a go’ at others for characteristics that are outside of their voluntary control.
I morbidly flinch whenever someone (who should know better) criticises say: R Watson for her perceived physical unattractiveness to said individual.
Sure, have a go at PZ for being voluntarily overweight. Fair game.
But jawlines? Gimme a break please!
We do not need to descend to their level of irrational invective.
November 27, 2011 at 3:55 pm
I agree entirely. I have never laughed at the big baboon’s weight. Just his unhealthy chronophiliac preoccupations with pudgy pink things half his age that, even he must know deep down, will never fuck him. It’s probably a cuckolding thing – he just gets off at being lead around by the balls and used and staying in a perpetual state of unsatisfied semi-arousal. Certainly more evidence for that than there is for any of his ideological proclamations.
November 27, 2011 at 4:08 pm
You echo my sentiment exactly – every single point of it – right from natural endowment beyond one’s control to certain people’s voluntary decision to not do anything about their unhealthy weight! But you put it into words more eloquently that I could ever hope. Thanks, Mr. Gray!
November 27, 2011 at 4:10 pm
Quite.
PZ’s voluntary behaviours are ‘fair game’.
As are anyone else’s, including mine.
Especially my various peccadillos.
But I am a bonded-slave to my impending male-pattern baldness, and my various acquired cardiac deficiencies, amongst other things to which I am enslaved.
I can do nothing about my age, either; and I find it realy quite offensive when I read unnecessarily snide remarks regarding ageism, one way or ‘tother.
Perhaps PZ is attempting to ‘do something’ about his age?
Sucking the Élan Vital from decidedly non-virgin slacktivist gynophobes in the hope of forestalling his rapidly approaching senile decline?
That I happen to be incredibly attractive to both sexes is merely a bonus, I guess. 😉
November 27, 2011 at 6:29 pm
Since when did being rational align with your sensibilities? Distasteful I accept, but you can hardly say that the evidence is lacking. I only regret that it was so distracting from the actual comment.
November 27, 2011 at 6:30 pm
I am also somewhat ashamed that it was a cheap joke on the same level as Man Coulter.
November 27, 2011 at 4:14 pm
@Overlord: It’s seriously reached the point, thanks to Myers, that the typical mainstream xtian is more likely to be more intelligent, tolerant and articulate than your typical mainstream atheist. And Myers and the rest of his baboons keep chugging away and making them stupider still.
Yes its good to see xtians articulating the same point. Numerous actual scientists did the same long ago. Myers can try and bullshit and shut people down – but the facts that these observations are universal are the best defense there is against the thuggery.
This is good too – 4. SHAMING LANGUAGE: – only the baboons have taken it to the point of shunning
November 27, 2011 at 4:29 pm
Methinks that you conflate or cornfuze PZ with mainstream atheists just a tad.
Whilst PZ can be classified as a-theist in a narrow sense, he is not a-theist in the broader sense, or at least his brainless acolytes are not.
For PZ has progressively placed himself in the position of an Omnipotent God.
(At least in his restricted circle of followers. Read Terry Pratchett’s “Small Gods” for a cogent and accurate documentary on PZ, who stars as Deacon Vorbis)
I am not an atheist, but am a staunch ANTI-THEIST.
I say that I am not an atheist because I can point to real gods that really exist:
* The Sun
* Prince Phillip
* The Emperor of Japan
* Pacific stone stele
etc…
And don;t come-the-raw-prawn with me about the bollocks that “they are not REAL Gods, because in so doing, you will be falling foul of the very crime of which you and I have accused PZ and his tribe:
That of redefining words to suit the false argument, rather than taking what the believers say at face-value.
On that basis, I cannot logically be an a-theist, for I know of, and have seen with my own eyes, more than 2 of these extant Gods.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it!
November 27, 2011 at 4:40 pm
Are you expecting me to disagree?
I was talking about the outside looking in. And the unfortunate new de-convert that stumbles into the baboon horde for the first time.
November 27, 2011 at 5:35 pm
I pity their naïve virgin minds.
For they are mere chum to the circling snarks & sharks who are ravenous for infidel flesh, and to whom a ‘feeding frenzy’ on the mind and innocent words of a passing dissenter to their orthodoxy is akin to an explosive orgasm for these amoral monsters.
December 4, 2011 at 10:50 am
Oh, I made a typo. If you could ignore that post, I’ll post it again, with the correction. If not, then no big deal.
December 4, 2011 at 10:50 am
I didn’t know who Ophelia Benson was until a few days ago when my fb friend who disagreed on Greta Christina’s tardbook post was attacked by Greta’s sycophants, Ophelia, and Greta. That link is here…
Then Greta decided to write a whole blog about it. She was bullying him, and then she even blocked him from her blog. After a few comments towards the bottom of the blog, and the one I left (under alias “SkepticAtheist”), she shut her blog down. I later found out that 2 of the posts were from the head of JREF.
http://www.freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2011/12/01/mencallmethings-pathetic-attention-seeker/#comments
Ophelia also left a comment on that blog that my friend blocked her, but what did she expect after egging him on?
Damn, I hate radical feminists. I think it’s more frustrating that they use fallacious tactics to make themselves seem like they’re right, it’s like a Trojan Horse, sneaking in their radical ideas. Their position is one that portrays women as being weak, who need special treatment, and you can’t disagree or else they’ll accuse you of supporting rape. They play the rape-card, much like some Jews would play the anti-semite card for bullshit. They are professional victims who polish up their ideas to make it sound intelligent to the less-skeptical atheists.
December 4, 2011 at 12:48 pm
Trojans? Yes. It’s like guerrilla evangelists sneaking theism into schools. It is a quasi-religion in every respect. I liken them more to christian flagellants. Eternally suffering self-inflicted hurt in response to imaginary evil. Ophelia is the vilest, most pernicious viper in the nest without a doubt, but Christina is the most self-serving, more so even than the Baboon King. She is the thing that, in tag team with Watson, kicked all of this poison off several years ago.
The hypocrisy in that ‘tardbook post is palpable. They alternate between “oh why oh why will people not get over all of this?” with whacking the hornet’s nest with a stick all over again, as the baboon and the pink thing did when they whored themselves to USA Today. I am now at the point that I put them on the same shelf as Westboro Baptist. At least Fred Phelps and family are consistent with themselves, and in that regard have a degree of integrity – so in that respect, the baboon board is even worse.
December 4, 2011 at 4:42 pm
I have a sneaking respect for at least Fred Phelps in that he is utterly consistent.
And that he appears to not knowingly lie, fabricate, distort, nor contort his principles; as execrable as they may be.
And he knows what his holy tome commands him to do.
He has plainly actually read the damn thing.
He may be a bit simple up top, but at least he is HONEST!
Gotta give the bro’ props for that.
Whereas the spew-crew (Greta, Beccy, PZ, Greg, etc) lie their puny parasitic heads off for:
1) The reward to their limbic systems of pure rage and anger.
2) The reward to the enormous laziness centres of their psyches.
3) The pleasure of fame.
No, I’d be friends with Fred Phelps ANYTIME over Beccy, Greta, Ophelia, or even PZ, despite his only balls being on the internet, and firmly held by above gorgons.
I have met PZ in person. In Melbourne Australia.
He is a real changeling.
A shape-shifting attitude-morpher.
A social ACCOMODATIONIST no less!
I did not really like him that much, and proposed that our (my & my daughter’s) time would be more profitably spent by dining at a Chinese restaurant up the road, rather than converse with PZ.
December 4, 2011 at 4:53 pm
He’s a pompous sack of self-obsessed shit. I met Myers too at the last Melbourne GAC. He walked into the South Hilton bar like he was royalty, and did a double take when there was not a groupie mob to greet him. Our group knew fully well who he was, but did not acknowledge it, just greeted him like any other punter. It’s an Australian thing I guess, not wanting to let the famous feel special – they all whine about how they want to be just ordinary folks. *I* even offered to buy him a beer, which he declined, instead scanning the bar feverishly for groupies that would adulate him appropriately. YES MYERS – I shook your hand and conversed with you. And guess what? You don’t even remember. That’s how insane and deranged and dangerous I am.
Yes he’s short. He’s pudgy. He’s very pink. He is covered in those burst capillaries around his cheeks and nose as all aging closet drunks are. He’s also very entitled – us commoners evidently were beneath him. I even have a photo standing next to him. In short, he’s the kind of loser that knows his best life is wasted and behind him, and now spends lonely time in hotel rooms jerking off over skepchick calendars.
December 4, 2011 at 5:52 pm
YES! It is an Aussie “thing”.
Over the more than several times that I met George Harrison when I was a mechanic at the Grand Prix, I first insulted his car (a Lotus F1, with water in its headlight cowls!), full-well knowing who he “was”.
I said paraphrasing: “This car is a piece of shit!”, not even to his face.
And he beamed from ear-to-ear! Liverpudlian’s “get” this type of un-introduced and class-leveling familiarity very well.
*I* even offered to buy him a beer, which he accepted & then declined (due to having so many offers that he feared for his sobriety), instead of scanning the bar feverishly for groupies that would adulate him, as per PZ.
Don’t beat yourself so assiduously. I once respected PZ, and my daughter urged me to have a photo taken with “my atheist hero”.
I wavered somewhat, but this was whilst PZ was ‘chumming’ the waters, by confronting in a non-internet balls manner, the brave Xtian who was actually competently arguing his case on the steps outside the venue.
I listened to PZ’s canned objections, but the Xtian dood came up with some substantive points, which PZ did not attempt to address.
To PZ’s minor credit, he DID suggest that the schooling sharks around him, (by now numbering at least 100), lay off the crucifixional victim for a bit, until PZ could determine absolutely whether the victim was absolutely right, or totally insane. (As measured on the Watson scale, my dear Holmes).
I don’t have a single problem with that, until he claims otherwise.
________________________
Predicted blockquote fail
December 4, 2011 at 7:16 pm
franc writes:
I was part of that group. Most of us did leave shortly after greeting him to attend a public conversation between Russell Blackford and A.C. Grayling. We greeted him with politeness, engaged in light conversation and then excused ourselves, explaining we had a prior engagement to attend.
To be fair, Myers was at the bar for a pre-arranged meeting with a Pharyngula group that had not quite yet arrived, so there was reason for him to scan his eyes about in search of them. I think it important to note this if only to avoid accusations of conveniently leaving out information. But I do agree with franc’s assessment: it did seen Myers was expecting far greater fanfare befitting his station which was lacking from our Australian nature.
December 4, 2011 at 7:33 pm
Quite.
“Laconic” is the term.
Possibly “taciturn”.
December 4, 2011 at 3:29 pm
People — not just men, by the way — call her a pathetic attention seeker because that’s what she is.
December 4, 2011 at 3:42 pm
An aging, pathetic attention seeker well past her use by date and realising she has no other life skills of any value whatsoever.
December 4, 2011 at 4:47 pm
Now now now…
Disparaging references to her age are JUST NOT ON.
Seriously.
You have sunk to their level.
December 4, 2011 at 5:04 pm
As the saying goes, it’s not ad hom if it’s verifiable fact. GC’s random sniping and generation of controversy for its own sake, as in the porn star post, are straw clutching last gasps. It must be horrible knowing you have reached that point and have nothing to contribute to the species other than malicious snark, and that its too late to usefully realign yourself. In that respect, she has my pity.
December 4, 2011 at 6:00 pm
I saw the ad hominem as snide references to her physical age.
You can do better than that.
Be a man and admit that you made an error.
She has far more sinister attributes than mere physical age.
Do for yourself what you ask of others.
Not for me, but for your own sense of personal integrity.
Come on, it won’t hurt! 😉
December 4, 2011 at 6:32 pm
“She has far more sinister attributes than mere physical age.”
Yeah, her vagina protrudes teeth when she senses a male’s presence. That’s how the PZ lost his balls.
Now, give me a drum-roll.
December 4, 2011 at 7:05 pm
@Raby:
http://www.mendeley.com/research/fearing-our-mothers-an-overview-of-the-psychoanalytic-theories-concerning-the-vagina-dentata-motif-f54711/
December 4, 2011 at 7:11 pm
MKG: Be a man and admit that you made an error.
Basically, no. People that initiate large scale demographic slurs and hatreds deserve no kind of consideration or respect. GC has been shitting on and demonising atheists, males and females that don’t swallow her crap indiscriminately. Her kind of slander *is* no different to slanders against Jews, blacks and gays in the past. She’s a desperate, dried up old cunt, well past her use by date, generating blog hits by inciting hatred and fear becasue, really, she has no other talents of any kind to fall back on. I have more sympathy for David Irving than I do for her or any of the sacks of shit at FFTB. If she wants to incite demographic hatred, then she can eat her own cooking. Fuck her. She profits by painting you and I as criminals with no foundation in reality. Fuck her. I doubt you would have the same kind of sympathy were I to say this about a card carrying Stormfront member. I think it is you that need to re-analyse your reality. Hatred is hatred. Just because it wears lipstick and beer bottle glasses does not make it any different.
December 5, 2011 at 2:42 am
*throws Raby’s drums and cymbal off a cliff*
Ba-dum-pssssh!
September 14, 2012 at 2:18 am
[…] know all that much about her. The very talented and funny sceptic blogger Frank Hoggle calls her ‘the talking prune’. I just call her a weird old […]