“The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean by Infinity is to contemplate the extent of baboon board hypocrisy.” — Voltaire (if he were alive today)
There is only one real consistent set of features within the sheltered workshop that is freefromthoughtblogs – and they are hypocrisy, double standards, demands for exceptionalist considerations and the right to be offended at anything at the drop of a hat. Beyond that, everything is a variable dictated by whatever tantrum is being thrown.
So there was very little surprise to be found in this article passed down the chain eventually finding me –
November 18, 2011 at 2:53 am
physioprof
Is there any fucken d00d on earth who has ever used the word “prior” as a noun who doesn’t deserve a massive punch right in the motherfucken dicke?
You’d think given the precedence of hysteria about anything to do with genitalia or sex amongst the quasi-Calvinist subnormals at baboon central, this item would have caused a meltdown of gibbering outrage, but it didn’t – a whole 21 comments up until now, none of them particularly concerned about the idea of wanton threats of sexual violence or abuse.
But then you realise it’s only male genitalia at stake, and everyone knows how worthless they are. The Naked Emperor himself states that anyone who is even remotely concerned about the genital mutilation of male children by the residual superstitions of bronze age goat herders is a big sissy that needs to get the fuck over it. Absolutely piffling when you compare it to the sacred and holy yoni.
Contrast it with something that is genuinely important, like cunt kick.
If you have the stomach to browse the baboon board, it is pretty hard not to stumble across the ongoing villification and demonisation campaign against Franc the Monster – alleged rapist and beater of women. The comments number in their thousands in dozens of individual threads1. For the Talking Prune, cunt kick has turned into something of a Calvary, much in the way that Elevator Guy has for Becky Watson.
The Prune’s love affair with cunt kick, and why she clings to it so desperately and makes it is such a relentlessly recurring focus of hatred, is quite simple – it is the only factoid in her possession that has even a slight, tenuous link to actual reality. You can browse her vitriol to your heart’s content, as you can that of the Baboon King’s and the rest of the dross that’s pitched a tent at freefromthoughtblogs, and what you will notice is that there is a complete void of any other kind of evidence or citation to any of my hyperbolised malice and evil. Nothing. Anywhere. Cunt kick is it. That’s all there is. What causes their hatred to otherwise boil over are the contents of this blog, which I stand behind 110% – the baboons have neither the intellect nor the substance to address any of the issues I raise, which leaves them with only abuse and threat, neither of which I let affect me or respond to, and that well and truly tips them over the edge. You can even see their lips quivering in futile rage.
Yet even this one precious factoid presents some awful problems for the dessicated one –
- She dare not directly link to it, for that will reveal the entire quote and its full context addressing some particularly vile baboon board behaviour, which would take all the wind out of her sails, and
- that it was not, as implied, a “direct personal threat”, but a nonsense hypothetical deliberately buried deep inside a 4000 comment thread on an unrelated blog that would take some serious truffle pig digging from lunatics, with no legitimate interest there, hell bent on finding reasons to be offended, just to locate – as they indeed did.
I have stripped the cunt kick comment of all mythology and presented its raw reality here. It is a story in itself exposing how the baboon brain operates – professional victims on an eternal quest to fabricate crises out of vapour for the sake of ideological mania. Here are a couple of samples of ensuing nonsense from Ophelia warping reality for the sake of generating raw terror. They are not the most deranged nor the worst either, just the handiest screen caps I have –

Comment from http://freethoughtblogs.com/almostdiamonds/2011/11/02/elevatorgate-challenge-4/ that appears to have been removed since I first quoted it.
.
Benson, like all career victims, is obsessive about wanting to frighten herself, and others, to death. She is very much a secular witchdoctor inventing demons to explain noises beyond the light of the fire to terrify the credulous children unaware that that she is a gibbering imbecile.
What she is showing is that she is incapable of differentiating an absurdist hypothetical from a tangible reality. As such, she should not even be using a computer without the direct supervision of a responsible adult guardian. There are only two real possibilities here for her batshittery –
- She really is that cognitively impaired and irrational, or
- She is not and this is a child’s tantrum routine made by hyperbolising an irrelevancy into a drama.
The reasons aren’t really that important as the implications are unambiguous – she is trying to convince the world that a) I am a violent and deranged maniac, and b) that she somehow considers herself to be in genuine danger. On the basis of nonsense a child can see through.
In other words, she is taking tentative steps down the same path as women that fabricate rape complaints out of revenge or for the sake of political manipulation. I know for a fact that any male is far more at risk from women that are this ethically destitute (they have, thanks to all of this kind of hysteria, real power – just ask Julian Assange) than any kind of risk I would ever pose to anyone. But the Prune doesn’t even pause to consider things like this – counterproductive to employ reason.
So let’s just have a reality check for the sake of Ophelia’s melodramatics. The very idea that any non-baboon male (or female for that matter) would go anywhere near the thing is beyond simply ludicrous – it is hubristic and narcissistic derangement, bordering on wishful thinking. Is this just more idiotic projection on the world of some fantasy about being desirable?
Face it, if I found Ophelia by the side of the road, I wouldn’t even poke it with a broom to see if it was alive. If the thing got on a bus, my first impulse would be to get off at the next stop. Any degree of exposure to her babbling is nausea inducing, and though the Prune may exude the raw sexuality of Mae West on the outside, that is all shattered by the ugliness and corruption that oozes from within her psyche. She is one of the few creatures out there that can actually make Becky Watson seem like an honest and well-balanced human being.
Fuck me. The arrogance is overwhelming. But this kind of exceptionalist paranoia is a mandatory discipline to possess if you are going to spend your entire life wallowing in slave morality and experiencing no human emotions other than hatred and fear.
And the basis for all of this? If you step back and take a look, beyond the contrived nonsense that was cunt kick, there is absolutely no substance whatsoever2. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. This entire delusion is concocted by whispered hearsay, amplified by chinese whispers, inside the echo chamber that is freefromthoughtblogs, cocooned safely from any external reality. This is deliberate, mindless ritual to fabricate a new mythology out of shadow, devoid of any reason, logic or commonsense. It is amusing to begin with, but then you realise it is this kind of echo chamber that Valerie Solanis existed in when she cultivated the belief she had to kill Andy Warhol for some perceived greater good. Perhaps a creepier, and more realistic, comparison is to the Manson Family at Spahn Ranch commune. The gullible and uncritical repeating unverifiable spook stories to each other sealed off from real life. Yes, that always ends well.
Exaggeration? Dunno. You never know when dealing with subnormals, that is the whole problem. What is evident is that my lack of any kind of concern at the nonsense directed my way from the baboon collective thus far has only seen a steady escalation of derangement. What started with common insult and slander has escalated to veiled threats, promises to “out” me (whatever that entails), truly insane demands I be reported to police (for what exactly, no one seems to know), comparisons to Dave Mabus and denunciation to GAC, to the current deranged ravings about hiring professional security investigators to harrass anyone that looks suspicious in the community and indirect, but evilly sleazy, threats against my family and friends – for their own good of course. (which I will cover in part 2 to this when my stomach can handle it). The derangement just lurches from one excess to the next and considers itself healthy and normal. On the basis of what? Shadows… Helter Skelter.
Of course the excuse that will be offered for the article at the start of this post will be that it’s humour and I should get over it. Sorry. More gibberish. I love my gallows humour as black as Satan’s anus. This kind of humour is not a convenience store – it takes no prisoners. There are no exceptions, no special cases. It slaughters sacred cows gleefully. You can’t endorse the Talking Prune’s and the Big Baboon’s shrieking hysteria on one hand, and expect this “humour” to be accepted with the other3. Again, “hypocrisy” ceases to be a sufficient term – but it is just another day on the baboon board with the retarded tantrum throwing children. The pride of secularism, apparently. It is entirely to be expected.
1 – Uhuh. So who’s crazy and obsessive again?
2 – To quote the Freethinker pamphlet mentioned previously “…Arguments based on faith, authority or ad hominem character attacks are unacceptable…” – yet this is what the sum of all the slander against me comprises entirely of.
3 – And in any case, much of the gibberish on the baboon board now can be classified as secular Poe – it is both impossible to parody, and if published anywhere else, it would not be possible to guess with any degree of certainty if it was satire or for real.
November 21, 2011 at 7:41 pm
She can, in my opinion, be very closely compared with the ignorant uneducated tribes-folk from Africa, who irrationally & almost arbitrarily[1] accuse their neighbours of witch-craft having caused their pathetic crops to have failed, and then elect to murder innocent albinos as an unworkable remedy for an imaginary problem.
They do not choose to blame themselves for neglect in their tillage/husbandry, nor even the weather.
No. It has to be deliberate malevolence directed against them from an outside agent, specifically.
_________________
[1] Of course, the vengeance is never entirely arbitrary, but directed against those who have the knowledge to cause them some societal cost. Usually by revealing that the offender is a parasitic fraud.
November 23, 2011 at 8:04 am
quite apropos analogy, MKG, and I did have a smile at the beer image.
November 22, 2011 at 12:35 am
Dude, you need psychiatric help.
November 22, 2011 at 12:44 am
And you need a kick in the balls. Assuming they haven’t been eaten.
‘Nother balanced, articulate, analytical non-personal attack style statement from a baboon courtier. Leading Freethought by example.
November 22, 2011 at 2:25 am
Ah, the always-articulate brahtard himself. I’m surprised you didn’t end more words with your oh-so-precious extraneous “e”.
That is one of y’all’s favorite ad homs. “Oh, THEY aren’t talking the way we want, THEY won’t listen to us, they MUST need psychiatric help”.
That’s such an awesome ad hom, because it’s a get out of jail free card for ignoring any and all criticism. “They’re in need of psychiatric help, you can’t take ANYTHING they say seriously.” It’s a good tactic, with a rich history, used to dismiss, among others:
gay rights
women’s rights
the entire equal rights movement of the sixties
On and on, “they’re crazy” is the way insecure groups dismiss arguments they dislike.
Because it can’t be that anyone might have a legitimate disagreement. No, no, we use BAD WERDS therefore our arguments have no validity. Perhaps I should use a phrase you approve of, like “fuck yourself sideways with a rusty knife”.
Because clearly, that is a phrase used only by the bastions of sanity themselves.
I will however congratulate you on upholding the FTB party line, you may have your cookie.
November 22, 2011 at 3:17 am
Illiterate fuck can’t even string a sentence together on his own blog. Can’t expect too much here.
November 22, 2011 at 4:34 am
PhysioProf, how come the others at your blog’s home take what you said as the figurative sentence it was, yet when Franc said the equivalent with reversed genders they all had strokes and feared for their very lives? Have you wondered that?
November 22, 2011 at 5:13 am
Lol…you already know the justifications that’ll be used as to why when THEY say it, it’s okay.
November 22, 2011 at 5:59 am
Well, they’ve never been clear on that enough to convince me. They just devolve into vague arguments that a woman is a victim but a man in the same boat is not. Never an actual REASON for it.
They don’t want equality. They want a special needs protected status. Like the “don’t offend us” rules of any other religions.
November 22, 2011 at 4:00 am
I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone fail the Turing test as consistently as CP.
November 22, 2011 at 5:36 am
I don’t always agree with everything The Amazing Atheist says, however he is so incredibly spot on when it comes to gender feminism:
here is a recent tweet of his:
# Of Women Entering Chemistry, Engineering And Math Fields On Rise. Patriarchy, do your job. You’re supposed to be suppressing these chicks.
and a new video – relevence beginning at 10:17
November 22, 2011 at 11:54 am
Sacha, I understand you happen to own a fantastic rear (Franc has said so several times) so here is a gift in honor that that legendary bum of yours:
You can create a link with the specific time of the video you are embedding:
So next time you post something about TAA, you may “fast forward” us all to the important segment.
PS
Any photos of your bum onlin.?..nah forget it…the image of a brilliant owner of a fine bum is more enticing.
November 22, 2011 at 12:39 pm
Any photos of your bum onlin.?..nah forget it…the image of a brilliant owner of a fine bum is more enticing.
You need to prove you have a cock like a beer can before you can earn that privilege.
November 22, 2011 at 2:37 pm
Thanks for the tip, Malaho, I did not know one could post a fast-forwarded video.
20 years ago it was an international standard of excellence, perhaps I’ll post a photo of it then at some point.
November 22, 2011 at 2:58 pm
an uncircumcised beer can cock may cause me to post it sooner.
November 22, 2011 at 3:06 pm
Will this do?
November 22, 2011 at 3:07 pm
November 22, 2011 at 3:42 pm
You are welcome epic Sacha!: I’d rather not see the photo (old or new), not because of its beauty but because the likelihood of a random loitering specimen of a certain mutant species 30%hyena 30% roach & 30% anthropoid would just run with it and misuse it as a dumb fabricated trophy…not that it would make the baboon horde any less of a failure to human ki… wait it’s just 30%…
Mhhhh I wonder if a cropped photo would work?
Shake the world with those powerful hips aphrodite!
Franc: I suspected it, Sacha is not only brilliant and sexy she has also made incredibly merciful exceptions with your case.
November 22, 2011 at 3:49 pm
[just need to add a NSFW note for an otherwise pretty humbling pic – Franc]
“an uncircumcised beer can cock may cause me to post it sooner.”
-> http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l95ktzF6Bn1qbl0uqo1_500.png
November 22, 2011 at 3:59 pm
NICE! I’ll scan some photographs this week
November 22, 2011 at 4:07 pm
Well thanks dear lady!
I appreciate the consideration! I assure you, I will be very thankful! and the face does not have to show…just to avoid risks with sub anthropoids that complain about being stalked but have no qualms stalking others…
Should I look at this very article next week for the sight of pure unalloyed booty-ness bliss or at theotheratheists?
November 22, 2011 at 5:37 pm
I need to borrow a friend’s scanner. I’ll let you know. I’m usually around here.
November 23, 2011 at 11:16 am
I found a photo from about 12 years ago that is already digital, so here it is – mooning the baboons:
November 22, 2011 at 4:00 pm
I already knew she was merciful, why would such a fine dame talk to such thinking-typing mongrel such as you?
PS
(ok, ok, I am mongrel too franc don’t feel lonely…sorry for the missing NSFW tag)
November 22, 2011 at 4:03 pm
No prob. I have no issues with it – just need to remember some folks are not browsing in private.
November 22, 2011 at 8:19 pm
“just need to add a NSFW note for an otherwise pretty humbling pic – Franc”
What is “humbling”? I don’t get it. You guys don’t have the same?
Aaaand my work here is done! 🙂
November 22, 2011 at 8:42 pm
Mine is the size of a jelly bean and that inadequacy fills me with rape rage. It’s true. Ask PZ Myers, who’s never told a fib in his life.
November 23, 2011 at 6:27 am
It’s not that I am against showing my face here, I’m proud of who I am. However, I do attend Skeptic and atheist events and I am fond of being a spy. Without the baboons knowing what I look like, I can engage them in conversation, or at least listen in. Showing my ass is irreleveant, they won’t be recognising that.
November 23, 2011 at 6:34 am
plus, it’s like mooning them
November 23, 2011 at 7:28 am
“Showing my ass is irreleveant, they won’t be recognising that.”
Not even in an elevator?
November 23, 2011 at 7:56 am
hahaha
November 23, 2011 at 5:51 pm
Firstly: Thank you Powerful Aphrodite!
Secondly: Are there any other photos you would like me to find?
PS
12 years cannot have changed those genetics, you still carry that power anywhere you let anybody enjoy that standard of excellence.
Fishing the net for penis images no longer feels as unsettling after your last reward…
@#$!@# Franc! I hate your luck with the power of 33 pulsars! you’ve seen her live…
November 23, 2011 at 3:49 am
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/11/22/fair-weather-atheists-and-sunshine-skeptics/
PZ Myers: “The hypocrisy lies in thinking that religion must somehow be exempt from that kind of examination, and I truly, deeply despise the idea that religion must be a walled garden that may not receive the same criticism as any other wacky idea.”
Now, replace ‘religion’ with ‘feminism’.
November 23, 2011 at 7:59 am
Wow. Just wow. PeeZus’s self-contradiction, hypocrisy, and double standards are simply stunning.
And that post really does read like something a mad man would write.
November 23, 2011 at 8:18 am
This is madness. conflating every small incident with the big issue, and punishment way beyond what fits the crime. This is a child throwing a tantrum.
November 23, 2011 at 10:27 am
At this point, PeeZus is having a temper tantrum.
Of course, he only does this on the internet. He was at skepticon, no? Yep. he was, on the list of speakers.
So there he is, the thunderous voice of righteousness for atheists, and does he say ANYTHING to the gelato mio dude in person? SURELY he marched in there and gave that scurrilous louse a good what-for! SURELY he walked in there and told that hypocritical merchant off!
Nah, He didn’t do a fucking thing in person. He waited until he got home, and then, after strapping his internet balls on, went from pwecious cuddwy teddy to PZ FUCKING MYERS. Did Jen say anything there? No. Let’s see, the list of the FEARLESS DEFENDERS OF RIGHT who somehow managed to not say a fucking THING to the gelato guy:
PeeZus
Greta
Watson
McWrong
Hemant*
Singleton
None of those fuckers had the balls to go in and even politely ask the guy “Dude, what’s up with the sign?” much less go in there with the VERY POWER OF ATHEISM ITSELF.
“Shape of a spinless douchebag”
“Form of a lazy bloger”
“Slactivistm Twin powers ACTIVATE!”
So much for how they’ll fight against TEH EEEBUL THEISTS!!!!!!!
*I actually give Hemant a bit of a bye on this, since he’s usually the guy saying “can we all not be complete douchebag pricks on this?”
November 23, 2011 at 7:46 pm
Heh… “Internet balls”.
That’s the entire baboon brigade in a nutshell.
November 24, 2011 at 10:09 am
Excluding PZ’s behaviour, I have mixed feelings about the Gelato Mio incident.
I keep thinking that if I encountered a group who was in favour of killing all gays, or in favour of torturing animals, or something else that I have strong opinions on, I would not want them to be silenced, but I also wouldn’t want them in my shoppe. I know the law well enough in the US to know that I could not legally exclude them from patronising my business, so I would not put up a sign in a moment of anger, however, I would be furious. I am not equating the mocking of religion to the violence that I mentioned above, I openly mock religion. I am just attempting to imagine what the owner felt. I am not at all taking his side, if anything, it would be nice to know which businesses are hostile to atheists, so I could choose to spend my money wisely.
I’m not sure if he apologised because he realised that he was wrong, or if he apologised to save his business. I can’t discern that from his apology.
I have certainly made rash decisions out of anger that I regretted shortly after, just none that have affected my business and none that I could be sued over.
November 24, 2011 at 10:18 am
here is another thought:
I can see myself taking note of the people who spend money in my shoppe who are part of the “pro gay homicide” conference, put the proceeds in a separate place, and donate that money to a non-profit organisation that helps those who are being persecuted.
I’m sneaky like that though.
So better to be unwelcome than find out that my money went straight to some anti-atheist group.
November 24, 2011 at 12:15 pm
sacha writes:
I’m prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt, and that it is a genuine apology made with the realisation that he did act impulsively and emotionally. He has no reason to court the “atheist market”, or that a boycott (or some such) by atheists would have any great impact upon his business.
To the greater Gelatogate manufactroversy, I find it to be just that: a small incident of no great importance blown way out of proportion to fulfil and justify notions of atheist victimhood. It’s squarely and comfortably in #firstworldproblems land. Meh.
November 24, 2011 at 1:14 pm
Pales into insignificance anyway when you compared to the broad brush with which Myers et al. slander atheists.
November 23, 2011 at 8:45 am
If it wasn’t clear already, this latest stunt should make things fog free.
The dude is off his rocker.
Can’t even accept an apology.
Just more of the same where any borderline believer that happens across his site will say, “Screw this. If this is atheism, I ain’t onboard.”
November 23, 2011 at 9:17 am
And then he puts a “fuck you” out to a fellow skeptic named Jason because Jason put a smiley face in his note.
Wow.
Got up on the wrong side of bed apparently.
November 23, 2011 at 11:15 am
Got up on the wrong side of bed apparently.
Becky’s panties still haven’t arrived.
November 23, 2011 at 2:19 pm
She’s hasn’t finished twisting them yet.
November 23, 2011 at 11:42 am
I truly, deeply despise the idea that religion must be a walled garden that may not receive the same criticism as any other wacky idea
Exceptionalism though, in the case of FTB is a divine right. This is the kind of statement where any and all criticism is heresy –
That’s all you folks. Evidence is not necessary, as everyone knows the new paradigm is guilty until proven innocent, so proof is not the baboons problem – its yours.
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/11/02/predators-among-us/
November 24, 2011 at 2:33 pm
Tenured Professor unwelcome for ten minutes at an ice cream store he didn’t visit.
TP refuses apology from the ice cream store proprietor for proprietor’s behaviour because of behaviour of other individuals.
TP is dismissive of individuals who do accept proprietor’s apology; questions their commitment to the ’cause’.
TP dons leather jacket and and goes water-skiing.
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/MpraJYnbVtE?rel=0
All is well in the Supreme Soviet.
November 24, 2011 at 2:35 pm
Hmm… I messed that embed up.
November 23, 2011 at 2:02 pm
The baboons are exhibiting something I’ve always been fond of pointing out, which is the inevitable moral nihilism of people who consider themselves perpetual victims. Whether it’s atheism, feminism, Christian conservatism, or whatever, universal standards of morality tend to go out the window when one’s raison d’etra is simply to even the scales with whatever societal force is supposedly oppressing them. Thus, feminists joking about “cock punching” men they disagree is acceptable whereas jokes about kicking a woman in a crotch are a crime against humanity, “anti-racists” insist that Jeremiah Wright is okay to say that “Italians look down their garlic noses” because only white people can truly be racist, and a thousand other things. People with this worldview are capable of rationalization any hypocrisy or duplicity in the name of correcting perceived injustices, which is yet another example how the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
November 23, 2011 at 2:12 pm
Well, I keep pointing this out. At its root this is all Nietzschean master/slave morality – not so much even purely gender feminism. This is a slave revolt from those that themselves feel inferior and worthless already without anyone else’s input. This slave revolt needs to invent evil in order to attack the masters they can’t claim to be the equals of. Once evil is established, all other conventions of ethical behaviour cease to be relevant and they can do what they please to try and destroy them. Therefore, what is hypocritical to us is simply irrelevant to them – they are above the law. They fight evil.
November 23, 2011 at 2:35 pm
Further, any being that feels they have genuine merit to demand equity would never stoop to the gutter behaviour of the baboon board. This is the exclusive realm of the professional victim that knows very well they are incapable of ever being a deserving equal. This is why Abbie Smith is such a focus of hatred – not only can she stand on her own hind legs unassisted, but she does so without squealing “oppression”. Abbie is worse than any misogynist – she is a traitor to the slave class itself by rising above it.