My the baboons have been busy.
My indifference is profound.
Hot on the heels of the latest batch of threats, there is a new insane debate here which I can only stomach a snippet at a time, and certainly refuse to read all of –
Fat, ugly, desperate or a bitch who deserves to be slapped, hit or gang-raped
Which, of course, instantly has to implicate me. Again, it’s overloaded with the usual accusations of rape, assault, abuse and the whole shebang of the usual substance-free tar-n-feathering the baboon board now seems to specialise in to the exclusion of all other activities. It’s the new town square I’m being pilloried in. They also babble much about having some pile of “sooper secret information” that the Talking Prune has apparently found and are continuing some ludicrous “ethical” debate1 about “outing” and “reporting”. It’s all in there apparently, for those that can stomach it.
So lets imagine they proceed on the assumption I am not Franc and that this cloak-and-dagger is pants shittingly terrifying –
Using the infinite baboon theorem, possibly there will be something relevant amongst the irrelevancies the dried up one has found. The problem still remains, how do you tell which is which? Do you use it all? What about all the poor other shmucks that get caught up in all of the slander escalation by the scattershot random data abuse being threatened? Oh, that’s right. It’s FTB – they don’t care about stuff like that. That’s called decency and not being childish and throwing tantrums and other stuff that doesn’t apply to them…
Really though, at the end of the day my response to any of this dirt mining is simple –
“yes, no or maybe. Now what?”
They sincerely seem to believe that their deranged Marcottesque reality applies everywhere and somehow makes it a rule that everyone with a penis is guilty by default and under strict obligation to prove innocence.
Sorry sweetie. Nothing says I even have to dignify you with a response. And I feel sorry for the random people you will shit on in the process. But maybe something like that blowing up in your face will actually teach you about something you have zero experience in – some accountability?
And my second response is –
“uhuh. And what is it this alleged person has done other than collate uncomfortable facts about despicable behaviour that no one has been able to refute with any degree of sensibility? Isn’t this what Randi does? Uncover charlatans and manipulators?”
I have enough of a readership to know it’s more diverse than just the baboons and unwashed slimebags from ScienceBlogs. In fact, for a piece of shit operation it is quite high. If we look at just the reasonable, non-maniac readership I get (which is precisely 100% – baboonboard%), I have yet to receive a legitimate complaint or any issue of a major discrepancy or error about the information I provide. AT ALL. EVER. The worst I get is the occasional typo notification (which I promptly fix). That leaves the baboons accounting for 100% of all the bullshit and grief I have ever received. At a guesstimate, you imbeciles account for maybe 10% of my visitors (and that’s when you’re really angry about something). What does that tell you? Nevermind, I should know better than to ever expect honest answers from you.
And don’t flatter yourselves that it’s your constant hostility that keeps me going. It’s the other 90% that tell me things like “your information can be relied on” and “thanks for doing a necessary job in an entertaining manner”. Jesus, get over yourselves. I write because I hate bullshit around me. When that bullshit pollutes secularism, it becomes a duty.
And my third response is –
“why does a bitter, sex-phobic old prune have nothing better to do with her life other than to cause harm to others with hearsay, slander, google poisoning and amateur detective work to harass random innocent bystanders on the other side of the planet?”
This is too funny. After all this, it is I that gets accused of malice, stalking and vigilanteism and much worse. Exactly who’s behaving like a deranged monomaniac here? It’s a pot and kettle convention.
Ophelia, get a life.
Morons. I present articles about the corruption undermining secularism in general. And when you are unable to provide any kind of adequate defense to the issues, all you can offer is deception, slander and threat, and you also instantly seek the revenge route. This I think sums up everything that is rotten with the movement. Stupid, selfish children having a non-stop temper tantrum have stormed the stage and refuse to leave. It can be summarised as follows –
Freethoughtblogs.com is a corrupt Stasi-like infection seeking to occupy secularism and impose it’s own ideological reich on all.
That is the only point I ever wanted to make. Thank you. That is what all your behaviour underscores perfectly. You are painting the perfect picture for the whole world to see. Threat, slander, self-serving bullshit, terror to silence dissent, slut shaming, blacklisting and just raw malice – the sum of all of your contributions to the planet.
Now can you hurry up and give all your conspiracy theories over to the authorities? I’m sure they’ll appreciate you not wasting their time with hysterical nonsense.
Note – for simplicity, “baboon” as used in this article includes all Skepchick related dross.
Related –
The sum of the baboon board’s contributions to my blog.
1 – It’s cute when they talk about “ethics” as if they know what they are.
The Talking Prune is wasting her time on me. So Ophelia, I am going to do you a favour. You should be going after the big fish, more worthy of an intellectual of your stature, like Youtube. Just look at all this freely available blasphemy. Go on, make a REAL name for yourself. PURGE IT. YOUTUBE MUST BE DESTROYED. (Selected from stuff found on other non-maniac forums) –
(just the tip of the proverbial iceberg)
November 8, 2011 at 2:25 am
17,000 hits on youtube for “kicked in the nuts.” 13,000 hits for “kicked in the balls.” however, a grand total of (music please) 3343 hits for “kicked in the” cunt, pussy AND vagina. How sexist…..WE NEED MORE VAG ATTACKS!
November 8, 2011 at 2:30 am
WE NEED MORE VAG ATTACKS!
Well, speak up then. How about you have your head blown off for a change? But I agree. There is no justice in this world.
November 8, 2011 at 2:32 am
Or maybe, just focus on nipples…gender neutral.
November 8, 2011 at 2:39 am
Here you go, 96,829. Youtube needs a Holey purging –
November 8, 2011 at 4:40 am
I’d just like to point out an ironic comment from the Babbook King today: “As a man, I can get threats for speaking against some cherished dogma”
Yeah. Especially when that ‘cherished dogma’ is feminist in nature.
November 8, 2011 at 11:40 am
Link? That’s wiki material.
November 8, 2011 at 12:31 pm
If you insist .. Being a woman on the internet
November 8, 2011 at 12:55 pm
Irony explodes.
November 8, 2011 at 11:20 pm
http://phawrongula.wikia.com/wiki/Classic_Quotes#PZ_Myers_as_victim
November 8, 2011 at 9:42 am
If they could ever produce a skerrick of evidence for their hysterical and voluminous ravings, then I’d be the first to examine it.
But, as far as I can determine, it is ALL fabricated anger based not just on zero evidence, but poorly executed mentally-sick fantasies.
November 8, 2011 at 10:02 am
The FreeFromThought Theme Song
They’re coming for you, Hoggle!
November 8, 2011 at 11:42 am
The problem people like Greta, Ophelia, Watson, and PZ Myers have are all the great battles of feminism are over in the West (particularly in the NATO type countries). Women are viewed as equals by all but the lunatic fringe of these nations. They can vote. Women are placed into prison or the special education system less often than men. They are far less likely to be injured on the job than men. They graduate from college more as well.
Basically, feminism’s task today is to correct the limited areas of discrimination and engage in the occasionally rear-guard actions against backsliding.
If Myers or Ophelia want to make a grand stand for feminism and really advance women’s rights their options are limited and harsh. To make a great advance in women”s rights today requires going somewhere like Afghanistan (like Myers’ son has) and engaging in combat with the Taliban. Or the Congo to fight the rape gangs there. It means go to places where the writ of the West is weakest.
Let us face it, when it comes to who has MOST advanced women’s rights, the competition is limited to the United States Marine Corp, the US Army, and the USAF. If you don’t believe use Google and you’ll see who beat down the Chomsky-defended Bosnian Serb rape culture, or smashed the Serbian attempts to recreate that in Kosovo, or liberated Afghanistan from the Taliban.
The problem with this is that Benson and Myers are not only too weak and too cowardly to actually enlist in the military, it also means confronting their ill-informed, Chomsky-spawned nonsensical view of the United States as the leading booger man.
So instead they spawn imaginary monsters to fight. Because let’s face it, blogging for women’s rights is a lot easier than surviving USAF Basic Training and then fighting for them in Afghanistan.
November 8, 2011 at 12:01 pm
That’s why I say Pudgy Pink Princesses – they are essentially white feminist supremacists. Even Hirsi Ali pointed out so deliciously, to deaf ears –
She not only points out that their brand of “feminism” is that born of the lazy and privileged white middle classes, but also the parallels I keep making – they are the gender feminist equivalent of Iranian clerics.
It is a quasi-religious derangement. They are not interested in actual egalitarian change. As with any theocratic type system, they are only interested in their own benefits – the rest of us can fry. Beyond a belief system, it is also a business model – the misandrist industry, which it is, it’s a production line of kit components that can endlessly be reassembled in new configurations, none of which ever reflect actual reality. This is exploited fully for personal gain. Career victimhood.
Racist, sexist and fully fledged fascist. They hate the whole planet because it will not obey them and grovel appropriately at their supremity.
November 8, 2011 at 1:50 pm
This is the reason why Richard Dawkins’ comment was spot on.
One does not need to join the military in order to help these women, they could go and volunteer, or even organise a program from the western world, which would at least be doing something.
This is the main thing that infuriates me about the gender feminists, they are spending so much time and energy over imaginary sexism, and ignoring real misogyny.
By doing that, they directly hurt the women who truly are in danger, it belittles their plight, it makes them even more invisible.
Even their views on most forms of date rape, only diminish the power of those women who have truly been raped who have dared to speak out.
To imply that Franc is a danger to women is not only absurd, the amount of time and energy it takes to discuss their creation of the Franc that does not exist, only serves a disservice to the women who are actually stalked, and have a reason to be frightened. By acting as though people like Ophelia and Rebecca Watson are being oppressed and harrassed, it is a smack in the face to women who face real danger.
Playing the victim card needs to be something that is not tolerated, not taken seriously, not given sympathy. The narcissism and self-absorbtion needs to stop. It needs to be outed, shown for what it is, explained how they are the ones who are continuing to oppress the women who desperately need help.
If the word “cunt” being used is your biggest issue as a woman, and you spend
that muchany time whining about it, you don’t deserve respect, same for the men who support these women. You are not worthy of any respect at all.November 8, 2011 at 2:02 pm
Yes, for all of the rape slanders, the one’s that are truly trivialising rape and turning it into a joke are the baboon’s and Watsonistas. Not only do they undermine the genuine victims, their relentless finger pointing, lectures and slanders are what send borderline men, already damaged by previous encounters with maniac fembots, to give up and assume that all women are crazy and less than human. They do more to promote true hatred of women than any mere male could ever achieve.
November 8, 2011 at 4:22 pm
Hear, hear. Well spoken.
Very well spoken.
In fact, that post wins the debate about the entire issue! 🙂
I have taken some time off, with beer in hand, in order to produce a ‘starter’ catalogue of public skeptics/atheists/feminists who have not yet “souled” out:
James Randi
(the awesome) Jen Peeples[1]
(the amazing) Mersey-side Skeptics[2]
Any additions?
(I hope that my HTML works properly!)
_______________
[1] Who did have the guts to serve in the US military as an atheist, no less.
[2] With their astoundingly frank “must listen to” podcast:
“Skeptics with a K”
November 8, 2011 at 4:40 pm
Most non-US CFI branches. The Canadians are particularly peeved from what I get told. Australian Atheists generally, but they are such bullet heads I prefer to avoid engaging them, but they have had run ins with baboon board types previously and know what to expect. Our friend James in Kampala. Indian Skeptics, a scattered and diverse group. I suspect much of the UK too, but I have few contacts there. I think this poison is largely confined to the US – as all sociopolitical derangement generally is. No one knows how to howl like a victim quite like they do.
November 8, 2011 at 4:55 pm
Alas, the Australian Skeptics have repeatedly proven themselves time-and-time again that they are very selective as to whom they apply their meagre and limited skepticism.
It is doled out on an hierarchical system, very reminiscent of a church. No: identical to a church.
I abandoned all hope of a skeptical interaction with any of them after my (say) third post on elevator-gate.
They appear just as regimented, just as committed to orthodoxy as any fascist organisation.
No negative remarks allowed, unless they are from the elite.
FUCK THEM!
November 8, 2011 at 4:59 pm
That’s what I said – bullet heads. But I also said they have shown some degree of being baboon proof in the past. Which I forgot about – The Naked Emperor would have been whining to them.
November 8, 2011 at 7:38 pm
James Onen (Kampala) is awesome, there’s no denying it. His ability to remain objective and patient in even the most trying of circumstances is a testament to his character. Besides that, he helps run a cool and interesting blog.
Yeah, pretty much… What does it take to get Australian citizenship? Promise I won’t bring the American victim mentality with me? Heh… I only half-joke…
November 8, 2011 at 7:59 pm
0verlord:
Conversation overheard at Australian Immigration:
Customs: Name?
Immigrant: Paddy O’Verlord, sir.
Customs: Occupation?
Immigrant: Bricklayer.
Customs: Criminal Record?
Immigrant: I didn’t know you still had to have one…
November 8, 2011 at 8:08 pm
Reminds me of an old Bugs Bunny (when they were still made with love) –
November 9, 2011 at 7:06 am
Franc, for the record there are also some true Watsonistas in the Canadian contengent.
That clown, Steve Thoms, who set up Skeptic North is a hardcore Watson apologist. He posted here sometime ago with his trademark blinkered rage because you, or someone here said something mean about Umbridge.
I don’t know if he still does it, but when he first started up his Skeptic North blog he was a big fan of Umbridge Ethic such as censoring and rewriting commentor’s posts that he didn’t like; arbitrary bans — in my case I was both censored and banned because I dared to challenge one of his in-house posters for misusing English and inventing definitions for words to suit her ideology. Amazing nonsense.
November 9, 2011 at 11:32 am
John, I was referring to Canucks as an organised body. There are individual imbeciles everywhere. The baboon board chief censor Rorschach is Australian, much my shame.
November 8, 2011 at 11:16 pm
[i]Yes, for all of the rape slanders, the one’s that are truly trivialising rape and turning it into a joke are the baboon’s and Watsonistas.[/i]
Franc, I do feel a need to speak up. You’re spot on here. My partner has actually been a victim of multiple (real) rapes (as in forced physical action). She was offended by Rebecca’s views. Let me tell you, Rebecca knows NOTHING (I can not emphasize this enough) of the mental turmoil this has caused both of us (suicide attempts, drug addiction, co-morbid OCD, etc.). Does anyone honestly think that Rebecca suffered even 1% of 1% of this mental trauma? My partner gets “asked for coffee” like you wouldn’t believe. And she knows better than anyone the worst that can happen. And she DEALS with it, instead of running off and crying that some guy actually found her attractive.
More real victims need to stand up and be counted against this cunt. She trivializes what rape really is.
November 9, 2011 at 3:56 pm
This made me feel better:
brilliance at 6:34
November 10, 2011 at 11:56 pm
why Carrie Irwan left skepchicks
why did Watson support AM Australia after this
http://www.smh.com.au/national/a-big-day-for-bruno-20090629-d2j0.html?skin=text-only
http://skeptopia.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/why-ill-never-return-to-jref-forum-or-the-amazng-meeting/
she only cares if sexism effects HER
November 12, 2011 at 11:20 am
Here’s another amusing GIF:
November 17, 2011 at 2:18 pm
In the latest news – Ophelia writes this on “BlagHag” shown below. The hypocrisy is fucking amazing. This comes from the woman who deletes my comments AND edits them so they are out of context. She has no honor and no dignity.
“Ophelia Benson says:
November 16, 2011 at 3:11 PM
Thanks Nate – I took another look and realized I can’t see any of her comments now, which means she blocked me. Nice. She blocks me and then talks a lot of (untrue) shit about me when I can’t respond. Famously brave forthright gutsy Abbie.”
http://freethoughtblogs.com/blaghag/2011/11/a-bully-plain-and-simple/#comments