– THIS EXPERIMENT IS OVER –
Time to bring this to close. There is a point where mindless repetition loses its amusement value.
Thank you to the rational folks that responded here. And thank you to The Naked Emperor and his baboon army for confirming all my observations to date – thanks for playing. Game over. Find something else to huff and puff about. “Freethoughtblogs“. Indeed.
The discussion on new, new atheism as neo-puritanism is continued here.
+++++++++++++
original post below
+++++++++++++
No graphic, no bullshit.
Just for the sake of full disclosure: I have just jerked off with an eastern european lady with a real body, cellulite and all. She has a couple of kids and a real life she keeps separate from the ‘net. We had an adult transaction. There was no shame or guilt involved. She agrees I was probably the one exploited. We laugh about that. I tell her thank you. You made my night honey. She tells me thank you for not being an asshole. I say hey… I know its a free world. We exchange token kisseys.
Apparently, a crime has occurred… If you believe… hard enough…
Fuck you PZ. Fuck you Becky. Neo-puritans. Neo-Nazis.
grey lining 
August 18, 2011 at 4:47 am
Hey, thanks for dropping a link to me on scienceblogs.com 🙂 I was not knowledgeable enough ( or in possession of enough free time) to join the discussion, but I am an atheist myself. 🙂 Rock on!
August 18, 2011 at 11:09 pm
Thanks ladywhatever. I’m sure we have lots of shit to argue about. But at least here we share a brain wave.
August 18, 2011 at 5:14 am
The only crime here are the exploits of a bunch of self-deluded guardians of Golden Precepts who make it their business to tell you what’s good for you based on their pristine “morals”. Fuck ’em.
August 18, 2011 at 6:47 am
Pics or it didn’t happen
August 18, 2011 at 2:39 pm
[…] and other such excretions from his imagination. Now though, he has gotten even with us all. He has taught us a lesson. Just for the sake of full disclosure: I have just jerked off with an eastern european lady with a […]
August 18, 2011 at 3:06 pm
Oh my dear sweet jebus. You sad, sad, silly little excuse for a man. Let it go, Hoggle. All I see is the shrill rantings of a obsessive, fixated basket case. Just let it go and try to reclaim some shreds of your dignity
August 18, 2011 at 11:12 pm
Dignity is for wankers like you Michael. The rest of us settle for honesty.
August 19, 2011 at 6:42 am
If you’re settling for honesty, I’m still waiting for some from you.
August 18, 2011 at 3:36 pm
Did Rebecca Watson ever express an opinion on sex workers? I believe she merely made the point that atheist conventions become less attractive to women if the male participants appear to assume that female attendees ARE sex workers.
No one but the Christians who want to keep selling sex and recreational drugs illegal care if you wish to participate in consensual sex for money–buying or selling.
August 18, 2011 at 9:44 pm
COWALKER,
“No one but the Christians who want to keep selling sex and recreational drugs illegal care if you wish to participate in consensual sex for money–buying or selling.”
Someone clearly is unaware of the history of feminism and its positions (no pun intended) on prostitution and pornography.
August 18, 2011 at 11:05 pm
Feminists are not a monolith and we’re talking about Rebecca Watson not all feminists ever.
August 19, 2011 at 4:38 am
Anne Marie,
He said this, specifically:
“No one but the Christians who want to keep selling sex and recreational drugs illegal care if you wish to participate in consensual sex for money–buying or selling.”
Sorry, but a large number of feminists do also care about that. And he/she’s talking about everyone. If he/she’s going to make stupid universal statements, I’m going to call him/her out for making stupid universal statements.
August 19, 2011 at 6:33 am
Again, verbosestoic, That isn’t Watson. Enough of the straw man, already. She has never made those statements (point me to them if I’m wrong), so, it seems to me your blaming her for your problems with getting laid.
August 19, 2011 at 1:09 pm
What Anne Marie says, several times. Feminism isn’t monolithic on the questions of prostitution and pornography.
If you can find a PZ rant or a Watson rant against either, I will be very surprised. But feel free to surprise me.
August 20, 2011 at 12:00 am
The strawman is that you people somehow keep arguing that _I_ said that she did. I didn’t. I said COWALKER said that. COWALKER did. COWALKER now seems to accept that that statement was false. So, problem solved, except for the continual rants that I was strawmanning by making an argument I never made.
Again, I QUOTED the precise paragraph COWALKER made. How did you miss it?
August 20, 2011 at 2:32 am
“Sorry, but a large number of feminists do also care about that.”
Sorry, but, no strawman here. You did imply that Watson gave a damn about hookers and porn.
August 19, 2011 at 11:20 am
Some feminists have problems with prostitution, for entirely different reasons from the Christians of course. But it’s irrelevant since neither Watson nor Myers fit that description.
August 19, 2011 at 10:20 pm
Watson and Myers are the vilest whores. Chumpies like you believe they are pure – while they exploit you. For personal gain.
August 18, 2011 at 3:38 pm
I’m completely missing the rationalism here.
are you really this lonely?
August 18, 2011 at 11:17 pm
What’s loneliness got to do with anything? You must be lonely because you think you matter here. That’s real loneliness. I jerk off as I see fit. I am the Übermensch. So basically, fuck you.
August 19, 2011 at 7:35 pm
“I am the Übermensch.”
I …see…
O.o
you should seek professional help boyo. Do you a world of good.
August 18, 2011 at 3:54 pm
Gotta be honest here man… TMI. Also, granted that gender feminists are annoying as fuck, but isn’t Neo-Nazi a little… sensationalist? It’s not like they’re systematically killing us…
August 18, 2011 at 11:18 pm
…yet
August 19, 2011 at 2:23 am
‘Yet’ is a very good point. This is classic set ’em up then knock ’em down, politicking. Say you’re FOR masturbation, and even go so far as to advise it, then in the next breath disparage anyone who admits to doing so. Anyone remember a feminist named Clinton, who hired the first black woman US surgeon general, then immediately fired her for her liberal views on personal matters such as exactly this topic? Fuck, it finally comes to this: at least now I know I have almost certainly been masturbating the wrong way most of my life because it’s the hatred mongering pathetic lonely way. I better quit while I’m ahead before anyone else finds out about my unusual perverted and ludicrous fingering career.
August 19, 2011 at 3:34 am
“Yet” implicitly suggests that they intend to, and have a reasonable chance of succeeding. Do you really think that’s the case? Why? Didn’t you illustrate not too long ago that their influence is a bit exaggerated? Grilled lizard something or another?
August 19, 2011 at 11:18 am
Yeah, better kill ’em all preemtively to avert the looming threat.
August 18, 2011 at 6:44 pm
“She tells me thank you for not being an asshole.”
Aw, she liked you. Hey, faint praise IS praise, right, Sparky?
No, really. I’m sure you’re a real Casanova. 🙂
August 18, 2011 at 11:31 pm
Having a contented existance is a guilty pleasure. Foreign to you. Sorry. Not my fault. You are entitled to whine about it however…
August 18, 2011 at 10:28 pm
Is your cousin David Mabus?
August 18, 2011 at 11:23 pm
Haw haw. Go wax your pussy.
August 18, 2011 at 11:03 pm
1. Feminists have a wide variety of views on sex work so you’re not really sticking it to those evil women by getting what sounds like a handjob for cash.
2. What the hell does this have to do with Rebecca Watson? She asked men not to treat women creepily; she never mentioned any view on sex work.
3. Did you pay for this just to think about PZ and Rebecca while hate-masturbating?
August 18, 2011 at 11:21 pm
“hate-masturbating” – at least that’s a new one.
Anne Marie –
What’s black and blue and hates sex?
A rape victim.
Go to town. Slander me to hell and back. Your audience is shrinking.
August 19, 2011 at 3:59 am
Wow! That”s funny to you?
August 19, 2011 at 5:53 am
You’re pathetic.
August 19, 2011 at 10:24 pm
Wow! That”s funny to you?
No. But your response is.
September 22, 2011 at 4:59 am
Tasteless and inaccurate. Allow me to provide a more informative source:
The Survivor’s Guide to Sex: How to Have an Empowered Sex Life After Child Sexual Abuse
September 22, 2011 at 5:00 am
It’s also available in paperback:
The Survivor’s Guide to Sex: How to Have an Empowered Sex Life After Child Sexual Abuse
September 22, 2011 at 4:46 am
Rape jokes, eh? You can go fuck yourself frank hoggle.
August 19, 2011 at 12:00 am
[…] yoni” and other such excretions from his imagination. Now though, he has gotten even with us all. He has taught us a lesson. Just for the sake of full disclosure: I have just jerked off with an eastern european lady with a […]
August 19, 2011 at 1:22 am
I have disagreed with both Rebecca & PZ. But I don’t jerk-off over it. Is it that sexy?
August 19, 2011 at 2:31 am
New word: “To hoggle,” to hate-masturbate. And to publicize your hate-masturbation session as if you’re striking some kind of grand blow against “Neo-Puritan Neo-Nazis”
Hilarious, thanks for the neologism!
August 19, 2011 at 3:04 am
Valkyrie, We can just use an old word to describe you. Idiot. “hate-masturbate”? If you see hate in the episode, then its something that you construct in your mind. Franc is just relating his adult transaction honestly, something your side is incapable of. Honesty is a foundation for discussion and growth. You wouldnt know it.
August 19, 2011 at 4:20 am
Quote: Fuck you PZ. Fuck you Becky. Neo-puritans. Neo-Nazis.
No hate here! Move it along, folks.
August 19, 2011 at 4:38 am
Oh.. of course we (or at least I) hate PZ and Becky.. Are you bitching about that?? And the reasons have been laid out in several earlier posts here.
But thats a separate issue.. Some folks have conjured up a new one “hate-masturbate”. Care to justify that?
August 19, 2011 at 11:13 am
Honesty? Let’s talk about honesty. For instance, an honest person would not describe either Watson’s or Myer’s versions of feminism as anti-sex or anti-sex work.
August 19, 2011 at 11:16 am
Also, are you insinuating that our dude here hoggled to visions of Watson and Myers because he LIKES them?
August 19, 2011 at 10:32 pm
Here.
South Park lesbians. Love them.
Bet you could scrape a baked on lasagne tray with your pussy. No, I will no longer take any of you seriously. Thanks for asking.
August 20, 2011 at 2:36 am
Wow, Franc. Did you ever think any of us took you seriously? Delusional much?
August 20, 2011 at 2:41 am
Why do you assume I care? Pffft. You really think I write for you? Silly. I only write for chicks that scan their pussies. (love you girls). So fuck you, you narcissist. You don’t cut it.
August 20, 2011 at 3:27 am
I guess you have to get your pussy, somehow. I’m sure they’re just happy they don’t have to touch you. Myself, I prefer women with self respect. I’d explain what “self respect” means, but, I don’t think you’d get that, either.
August 19, 2011 at 4:14 am
I don’t think the episode is where the hatred is. It’s more pointed toward women who don’t welcome your every advance and who aren’t interested in having sex with you. Why hate them?
Why not just hate the Puritans who use the police to rob both of you of your freedom and dignity?
August 19, 2011 at 4:30 am
Where do you see evidence for that? Can you please quote the specific sentences that convey this?
August 19, 2011 at 4:22 am
Frank, I love how you were self-aware enough to tag this “shrieking hysteria”.
August 19, 2011 at 4:33 am
Yeah… that’ll show ’em….
What exactly, I’m not sure.
August 19, 2011 at 5:03 am
lolpzfags
August 19, 2011 at 5:47 am
What kind of sad people come up with shit like “hate-masturbate”? Those who think that all male desire and any expression of male sexuality are ipso facto forms of woman-hate — that is who, just like that lovable person Andrea Dworkin used to remind us evil creepy men.
To which I say: y’all go get fucked, for real, ya hear? It might actually do you good.
August 19, 2011 at 6:01 am
Not all of us need to brag about sex online or think about people we hate during it.
August 19, 2011 at 6:14 am
Also: has no one heard the time “hate fuck”? http://www.urbandictionary.com/iphone/#define?term=hatefuck Hate-masturbate is the same thing without having the person there.
August 19, 2011 at 1:47 pm
Um… is wanking whilst thinking about one’s ideological enemies an exclusively male form of sexual expression? Is it the only form of male sexual expression? No? Then I guess you’re talking out your ass.
I loves me some good wanking and fucking. Thinking about people whose blogs annoy me whilst wanking seems like a good way to completely ruin a wank session.
August 19, 2011 at 5:51 am
It’s probably right there in front of my face, but I often miss the obvious.
Franc, I don’t get it. I’m not being a puritan, or even a critic, I just don’t get it.
What’s the purpose of this post? Is it to highlight the more than flagrant hypocrisy of folks like Watson and Myers? Or is it something else?
Please keep me informed — sometimes irony, sarcasm, satire, and subtlety go right over my head, especially online.
August 19, 2011 at 5:58 am
Just a guess: that it’s none of other people’s business what two adults do consensually, whether it be commercially transacted or otherwise?
And that no self-appointed Guardians of Morals (be they “feminist” or inspired by some form of religion) have a right to tell us what to do, or otherwise to enforce their views over us?
As I said, just a guess…
August 19, 2011 at 6:04 am
And what do PZ and Rebecca have to do with that, since they said nothing on sex work?
August 19, 2011 at 10:44 pm
That Becky is an ugly cunt I wouldn’t fuck with Gaddafi’s dick.
I feel lighter now.
August 19, 2011 at 6:15 am
I’m a bit confused about this “flagrant hypocrisy”. The oblivious hit on women who ask not to be hit on. More of the oblivious rant and rave about man-hating women. The oblivious are schooled on what the real problem is. The oblivious put fingers in ears and shout “anti-sex man-hater” over and over, not getting any point. Where is the hypocrisy?
August 19, 2011 at 7:58 am
NonPaul said “The oblivious hit on women who ask not to be hit on. “ This being the well-known default factory setting of global womankind. It’s printed on their foreheads.
Or is it just a tragic lack of ESP skills among the Oblivious?
Who are however capable of absorbing crude verbal communication, and responding appropriately, respectfully and politely.
After the fact.
August 19, 2011 at 8:14 am
Tragic lack of social skills, more like.
She tells people she doesn’t like to be objectified at these gatherings. EG, not having engaged her the entire evening, engages her right when anyone with any social skills would refrain. Wow, what a fucking bitch.
I don’t blame EG, he’s just an idiot. His defenders are idiots and assholes for defending his stupidity and for flaming her for her mild reaction.
August 19, 2011 at 8:24 am
I’m sorry. I must not have understood. Of course every woman should have everything she just said on a sign so the idiots don’t have to feel bad about being idiots.
I’m unclear about the meaning of your last 2 lines. Who is capable of absorbing crude verbal communication, and responding appropriately, respectfully, and politely? Watson? I think she did that in the elevator when she said “No”. Please, educate me.
August 19, 2011 at 8:26 am
Again, where is the hypocrisy?
September 22, 2011 at 5:16 am
Take a look around you buddy. This is the shit you are associating with. This is the bare face of franc hoggle, this is who he really is. He thinks rape is funny.
September 24, 2011 at 4:19 pm
::yapyap::sex terrifies me::yapyap::almost as much as adults being allowed to be adults::yapyap::in fact, people shouldn’t be allowed to make any decisions without committee approval::yapyap::rapist::yapyap::
You baboons are funny. No wonder you need to hang around in packs. Your gentle sensibilities would snap like a twig without constantly approving each others parrot squawks.
August 19, 2011 at 9:07 am
Thanks, Franc. Haven’t laughed this hard at anyone in ages.
Keep it up. Oh, wait…
August 19, 2011 at 10:46 pm
Hold still. Hard to get a cum shot right.
August 20, 2011 at 2:28 am
Oh, cum on, now. I’m sure you’re well enough practiced at that. I’ll bet you could squirt a fly’s eye at fifty paces.
August 20, 2011 at 2:35 am
Knock a cat of a roof. Scared the crap out of my first hooker. She thought she broke it. Like hail on a tin roof splashing against the wall. Of course we respected each other.
August 19, 2011 at 9:22 am
“She tells me thank you for not being an asshole.”
You’re familiar with the concept of the exception that proves the rule, right buddy? If she had to explicitly thank you for not being a jerk, she expects people to be jerks. Being a jerk is the norm.
Not only have you completely MISSED the fucking point in regards to the whole Elevator Episode, you’ve fucking PROVED it.
Well done, Sir… well done. And for your next trick?
August 19, 2011 at 10:49 pm
As above, Hold still. Hard to get a cum shot right.
August 19, 2011 at 9:44 am
(can’t get the hang of this nested reply doobry here >:| )
DefinitelyNotHim says “She tells people she doesn’t like to be objectified at these gatherings. EG, not having engaged her the entire evening” ..
And who may well not have attended the lecture. Never mind, I’m pretty sure Watson DOES HAVE A VERY LOUD VOICE which could transfix an entire boozer.
There’s absolutely no way he couldn’t have known. Is there?
Somebody’sGotAPeculiarFascination continues
“I’m unclear about the meaning of your last 2 lines. Who is capable of absorbing crude verbal communication,”
The Oblivious a.k.a. EG. It kind of follows on from there. Watson is the one dishing out orders.
And you’re the same age as me, give or take a few days, I suspect.
I’m not in any position to educate my peers. Who really ought to have got the hang of this stuff by now.
August 19, 2011 at 3:09 pm
Well, actually, I’m still trying to see the hypocrisy of their stand. Oh, I get it now. Advice is a demand for change, therefore, she’s dishing out orders… no, I still don’t get it. Maybe, I’m paying too much attention to what she said, rather than the strawman people have been flaming. That must be it.
August 19, 2011 at 7:55 pm
Universally binding “advice” predicated on her own suddenly-acquired convictions (in apparent contradiction to her and her claque’s previous stance. Unless all that “hot chix who hit on nerds” nonsense was strictly non-reciprocal. Or even .. untrue).
Since EG will never be identified (for a very obvious reason), the question of how he could possibly have either known, or not known of the Watsonian fatwa against half of humanity remains unanswerable.
Particularly since the clearest statement of the new law was made subsequent to the secret atrocity in the lift.
August 20, 2011 at 1:54 am
From what I see, you’re taking that phrase out of context. I read that as something she has been tagged with that she didn’t appreciate. So, I can’t accept your conclusion that she’s being hypocritical.
Fatwa? Really? “Please don’t do that” is a hysterical plea for the murder of all men? I guess I should have expected hyperbole and hysteria as a response.
Since you seem to enjoy hyperbole and hysteria, how’s this. I can’t believe you’re stalking me. How do you have any idea of my age, unless you went out of your way to find out about me? If I was a woman, I would be terrified of you, right now. It is becoming entirely clear that if this is the type of action you took regarding some random commenter, you would give any woman you take interest in good reason to fear you. I am beginning to think Watson’s reaction was too reserved, and the problem is worse than I could imagine.
August 19, 2011 at 7:42 pm
does the “Eastern European Sex Worker” have a website or blog, Hoggle?
you’re a no interest pissant who will be entirely forgotten tomorrow, but her perspective might actually be interesting.
August 19, 2011 at 10:52 pm
You’d be surprised how I persist in people’s memory. But you probably don’t want to know that. Scan your tits, or shut up.
August 19, 2011 at 8:03 pm
Interestingly, the quickest and least offensive method of reducing the carcass of deceased vermin (for instance snakes, rats or weasels) to a shiny articulated skeleton, for the comparative collection, is to place the corpse on the mound of a pissants’ nest in the pine forest round here.
Stripped bare in a few days.
Gone, but not forgotten. Just lost in a drawer somewhere.
August 19, 2011 at 10:53 pm
I was drunk and I regretted posting this. But I don’t anymore. Very enlightening exercise.
August 20, 2011 at 1:01 am
You know what? I was almost sure this was drunk-posting. I do it a lot, and it is clearly something I could have posted.
But the ensuing fun is too great to have any regrets. Hell, drunk-posting is what got me banned from Phawrongula in the first place. What a forgiving, understanding, educationnal person PZ is…
August 20, 2011 at 1:23 am
Question: is there enough beer in the world for anyone to fuck Becky now?
Yeew. Just fucking yeew. Most insulting thing is she thinks you want her. I’d rather go in a paddock and step in a cow turd barefoot. Probably feel the same.
August 20, 2011 at 2:03 am
Stepping in a cowturd barefoot would definitely feel better, at least if you plugged your nose you could imagine for awhile you were getting a nice warm massage on your foot.
August 20, 2011 at 1:46 am
To all those saying PZ never disapproves of sexual conducts, here is his latest:
“I’m afraid the fun is over — I’m going to have to ban Hoggle. His latest posting is in praise of Veronika Moser, which is fine for him and it does clarify exactly what he likes in a woman: degradation. I’d just rather not see it promoted here.
(In case you didn’t know, Moser is a specific kind of porn star, specializing in scheisseporn. Scat. Women smearing themselves with feces. And that’s the last we need to hear about it here.)”
Oh, well, she’s not allowed to enjoy what she enjoys. Fuck it!
August 20, 2011 at 4:08 am
(OIC: If one dillydallies (RL intervenes) the ‘reply’ facility seems to go off)
fatherdaddy says the phrase (about chicks and hitting) is “out of context”. There wasn’t too much objection to it from that quarter at the time. Do the clique disown it now? As you point out, subjective interpretation of others’ intentions is a mug’s game, and bound to lead to problems. Even coffee can be subjectively manipulated by the unreflective.
Somebody seems a bit prone to hyperbole & exaggeration today (hysteria is a bogus medical condition refined, if not devised by the Victorians to excuse treating women as irrational uentermensch, so I’ll give it the bodyswerve, if you don’t mind).
“A fatwā (Arabic: فتوى; plural fatāwā Arabic: فتاوى) in the Islamic faith is a religious opinion concerning Islamic law issued by an Islamic scholar.”
I very much doubt you are a “random commenter”.
I was puzzled for a bit. Who on earth could be motivated to haunt this dung-smeared losers’ dungeon, on the furthest reaches of the intertubes? Why the constant prebuttal and defensiveness, mixed with apparently genuine incomprehension?
So I guessed you were deposited here in March 1956.
Mainly because you can spell, and use long words. Unlike the baboons.
I could be wrong, but it’s a handy working model.
No stalking required. Merely pattern recognition.
And a bit of scepticism.
August 20, 2011 at 5:08 am
Well, of course no one objected to her phrase. They understood what she meant. You, on the other hand, do not. I don’t see the need to disown it.
Hysteria is a word being thrown around by both sides. I believe you can find the tag “shrieking hysteria” in the category list of this blog entry. Fatwa was your word.
I suppose my appearance here wasn’t entirely random. As for my motivation to continue to this point, I suppose that would be obvious. This is an issue that generates strong emotions. I have trouble ignoring it and just as much trouble keeping my mouth shut. Although, with Franc hoggling all over the place, I should at least cover it.
Whether you know my age or not, the implication was that you did. It’s probably not too hard to find that kind of basic info if you know how to use a search engine. The assumption most people would make when you say we are within days of the same age is that you did just that. If not, you said it to mess with me, or, you have some awesome cold reading skills.
August 20, 2011 at 5:53 am
Phrase? Ah. “Nuance” again. Or selective occult interpretation, weaselling, in my world.
Hysteria is not a word I have any use for as it describes nothing.
What any of the other nutters on here do is not up to me.
Fatwa was indeed employed by me. In the dictionary sense. Not the alarmist and bigoted way you chose to sensationalise it for cheap effect. An indisputable edict. (I suspected Bull (as of the Pope) would be crudely misinterpreted by rustics :D)
No searching. No need for the paranoia. Dr Mabuse is in chokey as of the other day, I believe (and hopefully getting the professional attention he desperately needed).
Just a good memory for trivia, despite my advancing decrepitude.
An eccentric interest in chronology and sequences, and their implications.
And a touching belief in people’s motivations being mostly rational, if not always too honest. And somewhat subjective. If not frankly self-serving.
August 20, 2011 at 11:07 pm
Don’t try and work me into circles about the words you yourself used and have been thrown around this site left and right. You are not arguing honestly. You haven’t really responded to any of my points, because you can’t.
I’m done.
August 20, 2011 at 11:13 pm
“honesty” is another overused word. And “i’m done” is an overused phrase. And “points” need a point first…
August 21, 2011 at 7:27 am
Now I know you’re just yanking my chain.
“thrown around”? I’ve used “fatwa” exactly thrice on all of the misery-pits of comments threads devoted to this failed putsch. Just up the page there ^ , and only to your good self. Twice trying to explain its actual meaning.
“Hysteria” I don’t use, as I’ve said, as it’s a rubbish word for a rubbish concept, ultimately deriving from prehistoric european beliefs about migratory wombs, hedgehogs, and toads, I think.
And I’m not bloody well stalking you, ya nyaff.
It’s just that contrary to the self-image of provincial north america, there’s only a very few people on the entire planet who give a monkey’s about this farce.
And even fewer who might be motivated to defend, against all reason, the appalling behaviour of the instigators, to the genuine detriment of atheists and rationalists worldwide.
And most of the “Don’t do that guys” tendency are only conditionally literate, it sadly appears. Unlike your good self.
Kinda cuts down the options.
Now. Points please.
August 21, 2011 at 3:55 pm
Aww poor franc hoggle has to put effort into being a human. Poor baby can’t abuse women 😦 It must be so hard to be powerless in the face of all those big, bad women that smack you down when you act up. It’s just….every time I read what you wrote here, I can’t stop crying for you. Please comfort me via cybersex, franc. If it works for you, it may work for me.
August 21, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Change the record chumpy. You will never be able to savour a woman’s genuine respect, nor reciprocate it. That is not my fault. If you spend your life wallowing in the victim economy, your entire world is one of “abuse”. You voluntarily make yourself shit. Again, not my fault. Why are you even reading anyway?
August 24, 2011 at 11:16 pm
It’s no wonder you call them toilet slaves…
September 26, 2011 at 11:50 pm
This thread is now closed.
To PZ and the baboon army: You never disappoint. Thanks for playing, and showing yourselves at your predictable, mindless worst.