– The submissive male agrees he does not have any rights, is always wrong and may be punished at any time by his Mistress for no other reason than the pleasure she receives in his suffering.
– The male slave does not speak unless ordered to do so by his Mistress.
– With each question asked by the male slave, the Mistress administers punishment. Male slaves are inferior and always wrong. Males do not have the right to question their Mistress.
– The male slave functions at the whim of his Mistress as a piece of furniture, an ashtray, a stool, human toilet, or just a whipping boy for the Superior Females pleasure.
– The slave treats all Females, regardless of age, with comparable respect or punishment will follow.
– The slave is to be efficient in his service to the Mistress and must kneel and thank her for the privilege of serving Her.
– The male slave further understands and agrees that he is nothing more than chattel. A piece of property owned by his Mistress and may be loaned, rented, or sold to any other Females at any time, or disposed of as his Mistress deems necessary.
Extracts from a typical Slave Contract
.
Possibly the most deranged slave foreplay you’ll ever see –
.
Seriously? There is a voice inside me that desperately wants to write this off as a well constructed secular Poe, but reality dissents. These gentlemen are all quite sincere. The title of this screed is A Manifesto For Conscious Men. They have a ‘tardbook community where the full thing is transcripted, as well as their own token site with nil content, let alone a feedback page. I dare you to read it without flinching or squirming. I can’t. And this is the blog I originally stumbled this poisonous nonsense on (read the rest of that at your own peril).
The only positive aspect, and only consolation, from this gibberish has been that while my personal reaction is one of cringing embarrassment (I could only watch the video a few seconds at a time before being overwhelmed), the women1 I have shown this to are palpably disgusted to the point of being enraged.
One called me an asshole for ruining her day. Another ever present fly on the wall was even more succinct – “this is one of the most disheartening items you have ever shared”. Both the understatement and the track record of the other material she was comparing to underscore precisely how deeply repugnant she found this.
The two clowns at the centre of this feel-good treacle that claim to speak “on behalf of all men”, which is the most offensive aspect of all, are –
Gay Hendricks, Oprah Winfrey regular and founder of the Hendricks Institute, who abandoned academic life for the goldmine of the self-help industry for the feeble minded. Also a pioneer in Radiance Breathing Meditation, which has earned him a series of honourable mentions at Quackwatch.
Arjuna Ardagh, similarly on the self-help gravy train peddling translucence from deep within Deepak Chopra land.
At first pass I was fully expecting the queen of man haters, John Stoltenberg2, to have been the captain of this ship, but he is not credited. He may well be involved, but being secretive to the point of paranoid, no one seems to even know if he’s still alive.
It is hard to conceive what kind of morass of self-loathing could birth this type of gibberish. It is harder still to conceive what kind of malignant narcissism must exist in a woman’s mind to find satisfaction in such subordinate groveling. I feel like I am looking at an alien species.
Conceptually, what we seem to be looking at here is the absolute antithetical extreme to the Taliban, a matter and anti-matter duality. Though they are at extreme opposites of the spectrum, the psychological nihilism of their respective ideologies makes them peas in a pod – a perverse reflection of each other. Both are ultimately self-loathing and life negating black holes. There is nothing positive or life-affirming about either. This psychic nihilism is captured quite perfectly in this quote from the cesspit of lies –
Karen Carr describes Nietzsche’s characterization of nihilism “as a condition of tension, as a disproportion between what we want to value (or need) and how the world appears to operate.”3
Reality will not conform to desired delusion. Implosion will occur. With the Taliban it manifests is robotic, mindless religiosity, anti-intellectualism and violence as a solution to all problems. With these “Conscious Men” it is hyperbolised guilt for all the sins of the world and relentless psychological self-flagellation, mortification and submission to a perverted, idealised concept of superlative “goddess” (or simply, that which is not male, and therefore an abomination). Both are bugs trapped in amber, neither willing nor able to come to terms with a world to which they are irrelevant, and they squirm in a perpetual state of existential crisis. Their entire reality is a hair-shirt.
It’s actually a good thing Nietzsche is dead, because witnessing this would have killed him. His other musings that thoroughly encapsulate these “Conscious Men” are on the idea of slave morality. That which is not capable of rising above instead seeks to drag everything else down –
As master morality originates in the strong, slave morality originates in the weak. Because slave morality is a reaction to oppression, it villainizes its oppressors. Slave morality is the inverse of master morality. As such, it is characterized by pessimism and skepticism. Slave morality is created in opposition to what master morality values as ‘good’. Slave morality does not aim at exerting one’s will by strength but by careful subversion.
A good summary of the main points is given in these philosophy course notes from Lander University –
5. Explain Nietzsche’s insight into the psychology of vanity. Why is vanity essential to the slave-morality? How does it relate to the individual’s need for approval? Is Nietzsche asserting that the vanity of an individual is a direct consequence of the individual’s own sense of inferiority?
For Nietzsche, vanity is the hallmark of the meek and powerless. They cry for a good opinion of themselves–not being able to set their own value. The slave morality is subject to flattery–such persons know they do not deserve praise yet they believe it when they are praised by the master since they have not the abilities to create value. Vanity is a consequence of inferiority.
And that is a nutshell synopsis of this entire “manifesto” – it is a callow pleading to female vanity from groveling male slaves about a perceived inferiority they themselves create and promote.
As always, when you blunder into such lunacies online, quantum sardonicism always has to interfere. The very same day, in fact, in the very same hour, this item also managed to inject itself into my newsfeed –
Rwandan woman jailed for genocide
Judges at the UN court for Rwanda have sentenced a former Rwandan minister for women’s affair, to life in prison for genocide and incitement to rape.
The ruling by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) means that Pauline Nyiramasuhuko, 65, is the first women to be ever convicted of genocide.
She was found guilty on seven of the 11 genocide charges she faced for atrocities committed in Rwanda’s southern Butare region in 1994.
The woman in question is profiled by the BBC here. This item was also within days of the latest microwave chef, the second in as many months.
This mythology of the infallible perfection of the feminine ideal with lily-of-the-valley scented poop has all the hallmarks of a deluded, Mansonesque cult. If you think that’s an exaggeration, conduct a thought experiment and consider, were they to have absolute power, what kind of re-education gulags they would have for society’s misfits that were insufficiently sensitive and aware? It’s pretty nightmarish.
And this “sacred feminine” also has complete disregard for history. There are many prominent examples of the ladies more than holding their own with the boys. Indira Ghandi, Maggie Thatcher, Ilse Koch and Irma Grese, Livia Drusilla, Mary I, Elizabeth Báthory – names just off the top of my head – warmongers, sadists, perverts, despots, poisoners and schemers, and hardy lightweights.
What is evident is that this feminine ideal lacks neither malice nor intent, only opportunity. In that regard, history does have a sexist pall. Though given free reign, the opportunities are endless and I have no doubt that women could equal and even exceed males as far as atrocity goes. And there is also the current batch of alpha females wreaking their own special brand of derangement on the world – Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachman, Ann Coulter, Helen Ukpabio… How much more ludicrous can the claims in this exercise in self-hatred get? Reality is never a strong point when you choose to drown yourself in any idiot ideology.
The question still begs – why? Why are these clowns pissing all over the rest of the enlightened planet with this derangement? The financial benefits are obvious – there is a massive choir base desperate for confirmation bias to preach to. But I still have difficulty with the intellectual and moral destitution required to intentionally sermonise in such a manner – I desperately want to believe that no one is that abject and devoid of self-respect and integrity (yes I know, call me Pollyanna). But there has to be some kind of other driver to cause such myopia. Stockholm Syndrome? Have these “men” been so pussy-whipped into submission that they have no “self” left? If this is indeed the case, then they defeat their own arguments. It is an admission that the female of the species really is deadlier.
At the end of the day it doesn’t really matter. They no more speak on behalf of “all men” than they address “all women”. I have enough respect for women to know that most will reject this for the toxic, divisive garbage it is as well. This is just another mindless cult of nihilism like the thousands before it – strangling itself with its own morbid puritanism, terrified of sex, individuality and autonomy. It’s less Orwell and more Huxley’s Brave New World (just minus the sex, because that’s too violent) – though every bit as malignant.
I pity the children of anyone even remotely involved.
Addendum: But wait! There’s more! There will always be more… until hell freezes and the sun burns out there will be more… Endlessly relentlessly, more and more and more…
Of course, someone has to follow this up with a counter-grovel. Here it is, from LifeCoachMary. I can only skim it. I really can’t take any more –
Honoring Men: A Manifesto for Conscious Women by Mary Allen & John Cole
1 – Granted, these are women that stand on their own hind legs and without crutches and were you to even suggest they are lesser beings and can’t stand up for themselves in their own right they’d probably scratch your eyes out.
2 – Queer, but more likely simply asexual. You would be too if you were married to Andrea Dworkin. Author of Refusing to Be a Man: Essays on Sex and Justice, Why I Stopped Trying to be a Real Man [introductory essay], and The End of Manhood: A Book for Men of Conscience. Review quote for last title sums it up – “A harsh critique of masculinity ostensibly written for men but likely to find its warmest reception among women”.
3 – The actual Nietzsche quote being referred to is from _The Will to Power_:
A nihilist is a man who judges of the world as it is that it ought not to be, and of the world as it ought to be that it does not exist. According to this view, our existence (action, suffering, willing, feeling) has no meaning: the pathos of ‘in vain’ is the nihilists’ pathos — at the same time, as pathos, an inconsistency on the part of the nihilists.
June 27, 2011 at 5:53 pm
“There are many prominent examples of the ladies more than holding their own with the boys.”
Heh. If you’re looking for the archetypal ‘testoterone-fueled savage alpha female’ for future reference, I suggest Maria ‘Marusya’ Nikiforova. I’m not so sure ‘pervert’ and ‘sadist’ are appropriate qualifiers in her case (I’m inclined to think her crimes owe as much to the zeitgeist of revolutionary Russia as to her personality, but your mileage may vary), anyway she certainly was as reckless and merciless as any in your list. Warleader, revolutionary anarchist, gunslinger, executioner, saboteur, terrorist, robber baronness – what’s not to like? And you have to admire a girl who circumnavigated the world just to escape the gulag.
http://libcom.org/history/atamansha-life-marusya-nikiforova
(Not the original article, which can be found in the Makhno archive; plus it’s unattributed – the author is Malcolm Archibald. I’m linking this one in because of the interesting bonus comment.)
June 27, 2011 at 6:10 pm
Oh, there’s no shortage at all. There’s also the ladies of Baader-Meinhof who got the German security forces to adopt a “shoot the women first” policy. And the Chechen Black Widows. Women are crazy, get used to it. Fluffing it up with the Goddess Delusion changes nothing.
June 27, 2011 at 6:15 pm
I managed to make it through the whole video in one viewing. The impulse to throw the computer across the room in disgust was, fortunately, controlled.
What a load nonsense. Gender essentialism with shades of “the female” as Noble Savage, all bound up within an abject self-loathing and fear of self masked as love, honour, and worship. And sustained by a gross ignorance of the world – an ignorance I have no doubt is born of the comfortable middle class American Way of Life (TM) that of course is (it must be!) the natural state of affairs the world over – that is naught but anti-intellectual mystical group-think they pretend to be wisdom.
They claim to respect women? And to respect themselves? Fuck! The have no idea what respect is.
Oh, wait! I must apologise for my above comments. It’s obvious I’ve not been fully present, succumbing to unconscious masculinity. </groan>
June 27, 2011 at 6:51 pm
Stephen: I managed to make it through the whole video in one viewing.
Stephen, you are hardcore. May I kiss your sneakers? You’ve made a weenie out of me.
June 29, 2011 at 2:08 am
A beer will suffice.
June 28, 2011 at 12:52 pm
[…] Parade of Eunuchs (greylining.wordpress.com) […]
June 30, 2011 at 9:42 am
Stephen,
Not sure if you finally dove into A Manifesto for Conscious Women. As you may have noticed, the tone is quite a bit different than Arjuna and Gay’s Manifesto.
Mary
July 9, 2011 at 10:04 pm
[…] the little girl can cry wolf before people stop believing her. Sure, there will always be a pool of genuine morons to use and abuse on a whim, but there’s only so much the majority will endure. Even worse, […]
July 27, 2011 at 6:25 pm
[…] blog. You have to remember my readership is not a result of blog and forum spamming, TrueBelievers, conscious men or my making a regular high profile nuisance of myself in the atheist / skeptic public […]
August 3, 2011 at 2:18 am
wow.. I thought I had seen it all with elevatorgate, but this one blows my mind.
The only response this gibberish deserves is ridicule like the one made by Will Ferrell http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLRu6PJtRv4
I am actually surprised that Mary Allen and co took this seriously and decided to build a ‘conscious woman’ response. A quick look at her website indicates that she’s also ‘new agey’.. ah, that explains it 🙂
Nice deconstruction as always Franc, and I am intrigued by this master-slave morality, and need to read up more.
August 11, 2011 at 12:57 am
[…] efforts of the Watsonistas, we all have pigeon holes we can be crammed into – Vestal virgins; conscious men (toilet slaves); misogynists / rapists; and gender traitors. Wonderful. Life is simpler and more […]
August 18, 2011 at 6:54 am
I have to correct your comments about the Taliban.
Unless you have studied the Taliban yourself, separate from feminized Western sources, what you are really talking about is the feminist image of the Taliban as patriarchy bogeyman. ie you are actually comparing feminism with its own propaganda imagery.
The actual Taliban is very anti-male in many respects. For example it is the habit in Afghanistan to rape or use boys and young men as prostitutes instead of women because women are seen as too pure or some shit, to actually use for sex. I find that sort of sentiment much closer to the self-hating views of the men you mention in this article. Overprotecting women at the expense of endangering men is a typical conservative trait.
Selective reporting by feminized Western media can easily create a bias where none exists or reverse a bias in the minds of the public, even without actually lying. For example if a woman is beaten for adultery in Saudi Arabia and ten men are also beaten and beaten worse, but the media only reports on the plight of the woman, it is easy to push a certain line.
Like most police forces in the world (I would guess all) the Taliban’s religious police attacked, imprisoned and hassled men far more than they did women.
if you had the impression that the opposite was true, perhaps consider your sources and their motivations?
August 18, 2011 at 2:54 pm
Yes. Valid points. And yes, I am a bit of a scholar of that part of the world – no one, but a few boring academics, seems to realise that the actual origins of Al Qaeda are there. The Taliban also only view homosexuality as being the one that is penetrated – so buggering little boys is perfectly normal, healthy and Allah approved. But… I view Watsonistas as Taliban more in the Bamiyan Buddhas context – raw destructive nihilism. The challenge still stands – what positive, as opposed to destructive, act have they ever achieved? Nothing. They are attacking atheism/skepticism with sledgehammers in puerile rage and nothing more. Myers encourages it. Dawkins stands back and shakes his head. I scream into a vacuum.
August 19, 2011 at 4:31 am
Well they are both authoritarian / conservative groups with an ideology but that’s not really much to have in common.
Specifically as for raw destruction I think the Taliban had to actually try to govern although they were crap at it. That’s why i give a lot of credence to the Taliban side of that story as explained by the Taliban Ambassador (referenced in the wiki page). Basically you are running this country that has been destroyed by a US-Soviet proxy war. You have landmines all over the place, poorest country in the world (or tied with Burkino Faso at the time), etc and you are trying to extract cash for your nations kids from foreigners who often seem more interested in trivia. Frustrating. OTOH the Swedes had long been involved with Afghan development through the SCA so it seemed like an overreaction but no doubt there were a mix of motivations and negotiations.
Whatever that is it is not raw destruction. On the contrary the Taliban were applauded even by their political opponents in Kabul for at least bringing and end to the pure chaos of the warlordism the US left behind from the first round of fighting the Soviets. They then tried to govern but were failures.
Of course they were also racist assholes who terrorized minorities in Northern Afghanistan. If they are guilty of an -ism it’s racism IMO.
The feminists within the atheist movement are doing what they have done within all sorts of groups of the last few decades which is try to gain power by enforcing a gender one party rule and making it the dominant ideology. Sadly there’s no real opposition to them and its gone on for so long that most men and women have internalized a negative view of men and so on. The lack of women in the atheist movement is simply an excuse. They would make exactly the same arguments if the atheist movement was mostly women (except instead of saying “we have to appeal to women to get more” it would be “since the majority are women we need to appeal primarily to women”).
I don’t think they are trying to be destructive either. They are trying to impose their views.
August 19, 2011 at 1:06 pm
The “lack of women” has more to do with venomous misogyny from other women than guys anyway, Would you want to “belong” if you were a girl?
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2011/more-dog-whistle/
That’s the chickenshit redacted version, a la Myers. The original was just “fuck you Miranda”. That’s what happens when girls speak out of turn.
August 30, 2011 at 12:23 pm
[…] *puke* puke* puke* Franc Hoggle is still wiping up his dungeon floor after this vomit soaked male-apologist B.S. […]
September 22, 2011 at 12:08 am
I’d love to see what you boys think of Shakespeare’s sonnets. Heaven forbid a man use the time-tested “sweet nothings” to tap into the socially constructed desire to be romanced.
September 23, 2011 at 12:42 am
For someone that advocates reading Shakespeare you sure do fail at reading comprehension. Cast aside you preconceived expectations and reread the post. Exercise some critical thinking skills (you do have them?) and the presumption that your opinion is correct simply because it is your opinion.
To help you along your way I offer the following: the ability to express love and affection is not conditional upon subservience. Indeed, the expression of love and affection for another is best achieved when one holds that each person in a relationship is an equal partner in that relationship. Perhaps you’re aware of the concept known as mutual respect?
At least you acknowledge that romance is a social construct. Sadly, though, it seems you buy into it. There are many problems with the ideas that inform this construct. Chief among them is its profound disrespect for women: that women need to be protected; that women are primarily emotional rather than rational; that women ought to be placed upon a pedestal, and that her dignity is dependent upon how tall that pedestal rises.
Perhaps while you are attending to comprehending the original post you might also attend to comprehending just what it is that you wrote. Do you realise that what you are advocating is nothing more than it is acceptable for a man to use a certain type of behaviour to manipulate a woman into having sex with him? Your use of words like “time-tested”, “tap into”, and “socially constructed desire” reveal a great deal.
I suppose you think yourself an enlightened person who respects women and affords them dignity as human beings. What gall! In twenty words you demonstrate the contrary.
September 27, 2011 at 9:14 am
i want to be a ladies toilet
September 27, 2011 at 9:17 am
need to be a ladies toilet
November 11, 2011 at 4:22 pm
charles h heller phd…
[…]Parade of Eunuchs « grey lining[…]…
January 4, 2012 at 10:10 am
These eunuchs will fit right in with this narcissistic bitch.
20 Things I Love About Men
I love when a man makes us feel like women.
I love when a man waits patiently inside an elevator to let all the ladies out first.
I love how a man who would go to the ends of the earth for a woman he loves.
I love how a man who will rub his partner’s feet at the end of the day even though he’s had a hard day at work too.
…
I love when a man knows what to say and what not to say to make a woman happy.
I love when a man tells a woman how lucky he is to have found her.
I love the way a man takes a woman’s delicate hand, brings it to his lips, and kisses it gently, showing how much he adores her.
I love how a man in love thinks of his partner’s sexual pleasure before his own.
I love a man who will do the jobs that most of us would never consider. Sewer inspector, anyone?
January 4, 2012 at 3:23 pm
please excuse me, I need to go vomit now.
January 4, 2012 at 3:42 pm
You cant make this stuff up, can you? people are seriously debating the points in there. I actually wish that people like Steven Pinker, Vilayur Ramachandran some day get around to analyzing whats going on with these crackpots. We really need a team of expert psychologists and psychiatrists to fix this. Remember how Jerry Seinfeld berates George in The Pitch?
February 12, 2012 at 5:01 am
December 20, 2012 at 8:13 am
Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your
point. You definitely know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on
just posting videos to your site when you could be giving
us something enlightening to read?